The opinion that the F-2 is superior to the Rafale or Eurofighter is very silly. There is a huge difference in engine thrust, armament that can be installed, etc. Besides, the F-2 has never been equipped with HMDs from the first model to the present, and only ADTW has the 4th generation AAM, while the regular squadrons deploy the aam3.
a 12.7 Hornet A AiM-7F + 9L
a 13.7 Hornet C AiM-120B + 9M
a 14.7 Hornet E AiM-120 C5 + 9X
Should be lower imo, itโs open top, doesnโt have a turret + from what I found its shell will have worse muzzle velocity (โ560 m/s against 684 m/s for M109G), maybe also worse RoF.
Video btw
The later variant might be given HMD since they were equipped with AAM-5. It looks like a good reasonable guess that HMD was part of the AAM-5 package.
Im not sure if id want to see a Hornet fight an MLD like its Desert Storm in War Thunder
No, it would be much better to just add these things to existing platforms. We should not have to grind out whole new vehicles for things that should just be added to the current platforms.
I personally do not want to have to grind out THREE new aircraft just for AESA radars when they can simply be implemented as either modifications or just straight up model changes.
What would be better is to add older aircraft before these modern ones so that if we want to get them we can, but we wouldnโt have to.
While it may not be ideal I hope we get a version with HMD
first of all the A was sounding very bad on paper so I put it there
and then thatโs the BR of the MiG-29 9.12/9.13 and that would be a fair fight
Late model air combat equipment is aam3ร4,aam4bร4, there is no fact that it was equipped with aam5 and HMD. If you have ever seen an F-2 with aam5, it would be an F-2A ADTW.
any changes in its seeker?
since itโs too early to add IIR seeker modern missiles.
but we might see multi-element seeker missiles like Python-4, PL-8B and R-73M, in game, they should have both type of irccm like manpad
Is there any major difference besides Avionics between the A and C?
slight performance increase iirc
probably not worth adding as a seperate missile
the A has the APG-65 and the C uses the APG-73
apart from that I didnโt dive too deep into itโs technology
the A also has much worse engines apparently, those alone would probably warrant 12.7
Ill do some looking see what I can find, maybe some threads on the Hornet
so, does the western planes have any things similar? multi-element seeker but not IIR
besides, it reminds me of an article from UK pilot who used early AIM-9M, they complained a lot about it.
It if doesnโt get an HMD, itโs baffling that it doesnโt get added lol.
Any documentation about that? According to this post, F-2 got HMD when F-15J got HMD when it got AAM-5.
If itโs really true that it was only used on ADTW, that still leaves some wiggle room for Gaijin to use for production variants.
Can you tell me about that article?
Funny enough is F-18E weighs more than an F-4 Phantom, while having not particularly upgraded engines.
When F-18C weighs less while having more powerful engines than the Phantom, yeah it gets up and go.
Super Hornet is something else.
Personally, depends on gajin
35G maneuvrability, maybe
Flare resistant higher AIM-9M
F/A-18A with AN/APG-65
F/A-18A+ fitted AN/APG-73 RUG I radar like F/A-18C/D 1990โs
But F/A-18C/D in 2000โs ~ late 2010โs outfitted AN/APG-73 RUG II radar
Planes
- DEU ๐ฉ๐ช:
- Eurofighter (Tranche 1)
- USSR ๐ท๐บ:
- SU-33
- GBR ๐ฌ๐ง:
- Typhoon FGR. 2
- JPN ๐ฏ๐ต/๐น๐ญ:
- F-5A [THA]
- F-5T [THA]
- CHN ๐จ๐ณ:
- J-11B
- J-10B
- ITA ๐ฎ๐น:
- F-2000A Typhoon (Tranche 1)
- FRA ๐ซ๐ท:
- Rafale C (F3. 2)
- ISR ๐ฎ๐ฑ/๐จ๐ด:
- Kfir C.10 (Block 60) [COL]
Ground Vehicles
- USA ๐บ๐ธ:
- EFVP1 (event)
- RDF/LT (premium)
- DEU ๐ฉ๐ช:
- Pzh 2000
- USSR ๐ท๐บ:
- BMD-4M (premium)
- GBR ๐ฌ๐ง/๐ฟ๐ฆ:
- ZA-HVM [ZAF]
- JPN ๐ฏ๐ต:
- M44
- CHN ๐จ๐ณ:
- HQ-17
- FRA ๐ซ๐ท:
- VCBI MK2 T40
- ISR ๐ฎ๐ฑ:
- Namer IFV
Naval Vehicles
- USA ๐บ๐ธ:
- Maryland (BB-46)
- USSR ๐ท๐บ:
- Admiral Kuznetsov (Baku-style, for test flight)
- Arkhangelsk(ex - Royal Sovereign (05))
- JPN ๐ฏ๐ต:
- Kirishima (event)