It was an incomplete prototype, so real in Gaijins and WTs terms
1 Like
Won’t ever happen but a man can dream. They would be worse than the American ones though sadly. :(
We truly need more Magachs, Merkavas, Panzer IVs, Leopards, Abrams, Shermans, Bf 109s, Spitfires, etc
I’d take more Shermans.
gaijin has stated the prototype had to be in a functioning state and need to be fully ensembled, as far as I am aware the OI was never in that state
I want the OH-1 as well. I personally don’t really care about the lack of ground armament. I’d love to act as a guardian with the Type 91 Kai missiles
3 Likes
I am okay with functional, complete prototypes if they are a necessity, but I draw the line at :
- Things that were never complete / never functional.
- Imports that were never obtained beyond a trial.
Depressingly real.
I don’t remember them ever saying that. Even more so because of the ability to suggest unfished prototypes.
Which means they are at least considered to be added. The OI is the example as it was passed to the Devs, so it is fully possible to be added, as it has been sent for them to consider.
2 Likes
Stupid question, how can something incomplete be functional? In addition, there are a lot of planes in the game that have never had weapons installed, so the lack of turrets is not a problem in O-I
4 Likes
im assuming based on the length and that its in the naval section that 3rd one is most likely A. a trophy ship or B. a ship sold to another country and under a new name
If that is true, they really should edit this part of the suggestion rules…
5 Likes
the flackpanzer 341 was removed as the turret was only a mock up and plenty of other tanks have been denied for not being in a completed state (Emil 3 for example)
I want more.
WT isn’t a simulator first. It’s a game first. I’m obviously against unrealistic, crazy paper vehicles like the P.1000 ratte.
But why not give a mockup vehicle a chance it never had irl?
3 Likes
That is a mock-up. Not an incomplete prototype that had at least one part work(no matter how short that time was).
Cope moment
The middle one of the middle picture perfectly fits G6-HVM
1 Like
I mean both, not one or other. Maybe my use of ‘/’ was confusing, apologies.
G6 HVM
Hell yeah, les gooooo!
Let me ask something; since F-18 is likely coming this December, how would F/A-18A compare to F-15E, in a nutshell? And F/A-18C?
I have all of AV-8B+ and F-15C’s modification bonuses ready to be spent; but I wonder if I should save them for F-18 or if I should just go for F-15E, for which I have to grind for half its line as well…