Access OFL 120 F2 like Leclerc S2
But Shard Mk.1 for Leclerc XLR
Sorry, I never saw Shard Mk.1 for C1 Ariete AMV 😔
1 Like
Fortunately for them though people told them how inept it is before they even officially did anything. So it’s really easy for them to take it back, which the lack of SG 2A4 last update might have been.
4 Likes
too bad its garbage and still worse then DM53
Reject C&P Jets (for now) and embrace japanese WW II “wonderweapons” or C&P WW II props with slight changes in weaponry or fuselage (gib more Schräge Musik plane variantions please)
2 Likes
Did anyone mention J1N1-S/Sa?
2 Likes
1 Like
THATS ALL IM BOTHERED ABOUT < THANK YOU SNAIL
1 Like
I wouldn’t expect devblogs in November if I were you.
However, there is something else that will be here SoonTM. :)
28 Likes
Because the usual “We dont have big enough maps!”, “Foxhound can’t dogfight!”, “Long range missiles = russian bias”, etc.
Also yeah, MiG-25 would be dope, but I imagine if it comes it will be a prem like British Sea Vixen
3 Likes
It better be an actual leak list.
It’s been exactly 1 week since the last update I need my next update fix
12 Likes
No Japanese Subs, clearly a fake.
You cant bring U-boats without Japanese ones.
Oh I-400 my beloved japanese Sub-aircraftcarrier
6 Likes
I hate to be that guy, but I don’t think that is a real leak list.
…what?
According to the Lanz-Oddermart formula Gaijin uses for APFSDS shell modelling, SHARD has a penetration of 720mm at point blank… it would literally be the best APFSDS shell ingame; much better than DM53 or any other.
2 Likes
Nah I-201 is where its at
4 Likes
reallife brother
The radar is arguably the “weakest” area of the Rafale. It’s not a bad radar by any means, it is technologically more advanced than the EFT’s PD radar. But the EFT enjoys a much larger antenna while the Rafale’s relatively small radome does sort of limit it.
Flight-performance wise EFT enjoys a higher thrust-to-weight ratio, although Rafale is likely to have the turn advantage with its close-coupled canards while the EFT will likely be better at energy retention. Of course, Gaijin can just do a 180 and somehow reverse the roles.
read above
So you have a source that contradicts the values calculated with its known properties, and an extremely long, dense and modern shell (yet to be put in service) turns out to be worse than a late 1990s shell according to it…?
I mean, I’m always open to learn new stuff, so I’m all ears. I’m just surprised by that claim, since i’ve never seen or read anything pointing towards such reality, so sorry about my skepticism, hahah.
1 Like
Gaijin doesn’t take real life performance just the specs of the sabot