I wouldn’t expect devblogs in November if I were you.
However, there is something else that will be here SoonTM. :)
28 Likes
Because the usual “We dont have big enough maps!”, “Foxhound can’t dogfight!”, “Long range missiles = russian bias”, etc.
Also yeah, MiG-25 would be dope, but I imagine if it comes it will be a prem like British Sea Vixen
3 Likes
It better be an actual leak list.
It’s been exactly 1 week since the last update I need my next update fix
12 Likes
No Japanese Subs, clearly a fake.
You cant bring U-boats without Japanese ones.
Oh I-400 my beloved japanese Sub-aircraftcarrier
6 Likes
I hate to be that guy, but I don’t think that is a real leak list.
…what?
According to the Lanz-Oddermart formula Gaijin uses for APFSDS shell modelling, SHARD has a penetration of 720mm at point blank… it would literally be the best APFSDS shell ingame; much better than DM53 or any other.
2 Likes
Nah I-201 is where its at
4 Likes
reallife brother
The radar is arguably the “weakest” area of the Rafale. It’s not a bad radar by any means, it is technologically more advanced than the EFT’s PD radar. But the EFT enjoys a much larger antenna while the Rafale’s relatively small radome does sort of limit it.
Flight-performance wise EFT enjoys a higher thrust-to-weight ratio, although Rafale is likely to have the turn advantage with its close-coupled canards while the EFT will likely be better at energy retention. Of course, Gaijin can just do a 180 and somehow reverse the roles.
read above
So you have a source that contradicts the values calculated with its known properties, and an extremely long, dense and modern shell (yet to be put in service) turns out to be worse than a late 1990s shell according to it…?
I mean, I’m always open to learn new stuff, so I’m all ears. I’m just surprised by that claim, since i’ve never seen or read anything pointing towards such reality, so sorry about my skepticism, hahah.
1 Like
Gaijin doesn’t take real life performance just the specs of the sabot
Italy never had any DM53s as well.
yes you can, to be fair i understand USA, Germany and Russia to be first
AASM HAMMER is very capable, rocket-booster assisted bomb so it doesn’t need to worry about penetration with varying ranges and warheads, it also is SAL or IR guided and we already have IR munitions in-game so the SAL argument holds little ground for Hammer but it does for brimstone.
It can carry at least 6 (probably more but ive never seen more than 6 mounted at a time).
I don’t see why it should be that way but I can see why it might, Japan and Germany were the biggest users of U-Boats therefore they should be the principle nations, however the big 3 exist.
It’s like in the naval sub-hunting event, it was Germany against the US, but irl in WW2 the UK had the most sub-kills and practically wrote the book on submarine hunting with the first ASW school in the world which was then shared with the allied forces (the ratio of British kills goes even higher if you consider the amount of assisted hunts performed with joint actions between the RN and navies that were not the USN).
1 Like
I mean IJN subs sank carrier’s and warships and easily have the most varied and a very large submarine fleet. That bring said soviet subs were still pretty large force.
Honestly i wish they stopped with the whole 2 or 3 nations get new category of vehicles…when it comes to subs id say every nation has something to offer.
3 Likes
to be fair they also did the same with tanks, when it was originally released, everybody will get there turn eventually, just a matter of time!
1 Like
For once i agree with you. Royal navy subs should be in. Though i will point out this is about subs and not sub hunting, abd that the Americans did to the Japanese in 2 years what the Germans couldnt in 6 :P.
1 Like