BeNeLux was added to fill gaps in the French tree and boost lineups. That’s doesnt mean we can’t or won’t add top tier machines when it’s possible to do so also.
You are confusing two different things.
The UK has benefited from a top tier multirole light jet fighter thanks to it’s sub tree.
Just because you don’t wish to count it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
again im talking about ground, not to mention the SA gripen is one of the least accurate planes in game with a completely made up list of weapons so they could put it into the tree.
ah yes the 12.0 gap, or is this to bolster? and if thats the case they still have 4 really solid MBTs I get the 2A4 since france jumps from 9.7 to 12.0 but I dont see how one tree can ge 2 12.0s when they had no gap and 4 MBTs but another cant recive anything past 10.3 in the exact same conditions but with worse tanks and SPAA
ASM-2 could be fine, just remove the lock after fire and use lock and fire, it will just like a BIG AGM-65.
As for GCS-1, I remember it’s not a imaging seeker, nothing like it is in game, and hard to model it, and that’s why gaijin didn’t add it.
I dont doubt it but thats my point france already had an arguably stronger top tier line up and then they get 2 meta tanks from their sub, while the uk is still stuck with not a single tank past 10.3 from either of their subs and most likely wont ever have a tank past that point since gaijin chose 2 nations that dont really have a great tank fleet
ASM-2 yes, if it can work with TGP then ot would be fine as “heavy” AGM-65G equivalent limited by IR range.
But ASM-2B with GPS might be too powerful, since then it is very comparable to Grom-1 that wasn’t added.
It is an IR seeker with IRCCM, things like it are in game. The issue is that the player doesn’t lock the target, the bomb does it after the drop and has no IFF, so there is no easy way to make sure it locks an enemy.