It would also help with the shit BR gaps sweden air has but thats not whats gonna happen so we gotta enjoy the BR gap because gaijin fucked over the A though thats pretty par for the course with how they add air vehicles on sweden.
Also the F16A is the only contemporary to the Gripen A in dogfights due to its weight. A even slightly competent pilot should be able to hold his own if he knows how to bleed deltas.
I wish it wasnt
USN Legacy Hornet 80’s for USA tech tree maybe F/A-18C Early
Gaijin could add Finnish F/A-18C basic with Legacy Hornet (AN/APG-73 RUG I radar) from USN (F/A-18C late) and Swiss (F/A-18C Upgrade 21 or 25) but after legacy hornet 80’s
RAAF F/A-18A basic in 80’s like F/A-18A or F/A-18C Early from USN
F/A-18D basic (RMAF) Like F/A-18C/D (Early) from USN and F/A-18A basic from RAAF
EF-18A similar to F/A-18A & F/A-18C (Early) from USN
But Iberian (Portuguese & Spanish) not 3rd sub tree for Italy after hungary & romania sure
Honestly, i cant see gaijin adding the ealy F18 for finland or the swiss because having another vehicle with mininal changes wont be enough to warrant a new BR with the current compression. Now if they limit the missiles then yes it makes sense and unfortunately thats probably how they will do it if they go down that route.
Not until I spade my A-10C lololol ))))
Just revert its air and ground BR and it would be somewhat balanced. 4xAIM-9M with HMD would be too destructive in 11.3, and in 12.0 GRB, the airframe was too bad to deal with even ITO 90s, needless to say pantsirs.
Little too much confidence in the average American pilot there lmao
I mean gaijin gave sweden copy paste aircraft twice because hur dur one missile difference = meaningful difference
Top
Tier
Folders
Please
Gaijin
I mean there isn’t really a limit when it comes to subs I mean like look at Canada and Australia.
They aren’t subs but we could still get there tech.
But yea Iberian could of been a way more better subs for Italy than Hungary was.
Gaijin are scared of top tier folders. Pretty much all of the recent top tier additions could have been foldered with their versions prior. In most cases there’s a slight FM and performance change and one or two weapon changes and thats it.
-_-
Don’t you just love it
I would note, thats a Bismarck class battleship with the potential for a 20 second reload…
Enjoy that slap to the face.
Personally I think it will either be Mackensen, Ersatz Yorck or Gneisenau 38cm.
Most strike aircraft could be foldered. Though if gaijin foldered what needed to be foldered on sweden there would be 7 vehicles between 3.7 and 13.7
Not possible- Gneisenau was already leaked, and it has the 280mm guns.
Probably the planned Rank VI Premium for whenever Rank VII is released, hahah.
With Sweden top tier Gaijin should have foldered both JA37’s together and both JAS-39’s together. Literally 1 missile difference in both cases. Yet you need 400k RP for 1 new missile
FULL UNIT SHOWCASE | Sea Power | Cold War Naval RTS (youtube.com)
Think of the possibilities in War Thunder when we get to this
This is a great RTS (day 1 buy from me), but still want to see all this added to War Thunder
They definitely do not need a second scharnhorst class particularly with a 17 second reload and 9 guns.
My fingers are crossed for Mackensen or Ersatz Yorck as they’d actually be balanced and then they can remove Scharnhorst until we get to rank 7 and br 8.0.
That ship should not be in-game and needs removing and replacing like the CV-90120 got switched out for the TML (or whichever way around it was).
