Yeah totally agree. I just like to edge majormajestic on when it comes to subs.
He’s known to drop hints much earlier like the Dutch NF-5…which is still not there 😭
1 Like
Britain has the first nuclear sub in WTM, and the first AShM and VLS ships as well
Meanwhile in war thunder PC/console
1 Like
Wait really? Which one?
So BR change plan, when?
75 or 80% new battleship top tier for great britain tech tree coming to next major update, my guess
But gaijin no decompression max BR higher 7.0
I guess the early USN legacy hornet in 80’s for USA tech tree but not sure might be F/A-18A or F/A-18C Early
F/A-18C basic from swiss limited IR SRAAM only and no Air-to-Ground ordnance
I guess at least 4 aircraft could get Anti-radiation missiles
The first nuclear sub is the HMS Valiant
AShM destroyer - type 21
VLS destroyer - type 23
2 Likes
Gszabi’s leaks are based on datamines.
If it gets added to WT’s files around the time of an update, Gszabi lets us know.
But no, it doesn’t guarantee that it will be added. None of the trustworthy leakers have a 100% accuracy rate, and that’s because they’re working with limited information.
I’ve already made my guesses about what the 7.0s will be. For UK a tech-tree QE seems most likely, though a Revenge, Repulse, or Nelson are all possible at this point.
Any hornets added would almost certainly be “legacy” F/A-18s, either A-C or foreign variants. We know that in addition to the US, Germany would get one through Switzerland (it was in the files). Other likely possibilities I’m familiar with are Sweden (through Finland), UK (through Canada or Australia), Italy (through Spain), and Japan (through Malaysia).
Of course, if they’re adding a new weapon system, it’s likely that there may be a couple new vehicles added specifically to take advantage of it.
I agree. Feels like we are overdue by about 2 months
Is a BR Change planned anytime soon? Feels like we probably should have had one by now, was expecting one around the middle of August.
3 Likes
Only if you had Lancs lol
ngl night battles for air would be quiet fun
Lancs are still overtiered if night battles were introduced and they recived the navigation system onboard. RAF bombers are simply not in the right designs for this game environment.
1 Like
I hope too
I want to take full tracers on a P-82 and mag dump in that lol
Once integrated into the game, these elements can be further enhanced. For instance, strike fighters and bombers may initially be underdeveloped, but they will continue to receive improvements over time.
Strike fighters should be individualized, with all weapons added. Maps need to be expanded, and specific targets for strike aircraft should be included. Strategic bombers need to be separated and modernized.
The naval aspect should focus on modern combat vessels and introduce additional weapon platforms such as submarines, ASW (Anti-Submarine Warfare), and naval helicopters.
1 Like
One day the Belgian F-16A will be at a playable BR, or at least drag the F-15A/J/Baz and Gripen A to 13.3 with it so everyone is in the sufferbus.
Eh id rather the gripen A be correct with its early model and placed at 12.7 with the f16A since theyd basically be identical (AA wise) or decompress everything and buff the gripen A to its historical 2012 standard which means its a gripen C without the 5th pylon. So basically what the C is rn. It shouldn’t be 13.0 with what it has.
1 Like
It would be nice to see a Gripen with the 9Ls to have it compete with the F-16A since the A wipes the floor with everything else at that BR