Do you only play japan (dont know where the reply message went)
Just give more SPAA. Thats all a man like me needs.
1 Like
I play a few nations russia america and britian and china. I have top tier in 3 nations
I wouldn’t say that when it wasn’t even the selling point for its update.
All it was was for the premium MBTs added all this year the have only made curtain communities hate other ones. (and fueled the bad decisions)
Japan literally needs the type 87 to be given its actually thermals so you can quickly lock a target with the radar. Or perhaps give japan the mpms or perhaps just give japan a south korea sub tree of spaa. I’m tired of being killed by air that I have no really chance of stopping and have to rely on my allies
1 Like
It’s not really a competition. When you start listing other TTs that are “in a worse state” the list will get pretty long.
So maybe US ground isn’t all that neglected?
Kind of the same ideas with all the threads about how the Abrams is “nerfed” and “bad” when it’s quite a bit better than many other MBTs in game.
It’s just not really accurate to describe the US TT as neglected or the Abrams as bad etc.
But Japan has no SPAA to add in that Br bracket, Gaijin, probably.
LOL gaijin loves ignoring things. Like the type 87 without a doubt has thermals but it would BE TO Op if it was easier to lock on a target with the radar. That i often enough cant even touch
The Type 87 doesn’t have thermals my guy. It’s low-light NVD’s and an optical tracking system. Like in actuality and in game.
1 Like
Japan, italy and Israel all suffer from effectively having no long or medium range missle systems with radars. Leaving all three to literally have to rely on other nations for effective spaa
It literally does have thermals
Point to a primary source document where it says it has them and submit a bug report on it if you think it does.
Make a bug report then, talking about this in the forums won’t help. Also don’t forget to add valid sources. Community Bug Reporting System
Im annoy that japan got a battle bus ifv squadron tank in the last update. An no suggestion on how to fix japan top tier has actually been taken
It doesn’t matter whether it’s better than Ariete or not.
Because, as I said, this isn’t a competition.
The Abrams turret rings are broken. The Abrams fuel tank bulkheads are wrong. SEP and SEPv2’s turret armor is underperforming.
When a tank has issues, these must be addressed and solved; not denied “be- because it’s still better than (X) or (Y)”.
Apart from all of the objective issues in modelling their tanks suffer from, it is undeniable that there hasn’t been a single significant change or improvement since 2019. Thermals gen. That’s it. 5 years of sidegrades.
Same goes for France? Ok, and their issues should be addressed and corrected too. Not “before”, not “first”… TOO. Because Gaijin could very well perfectly do so. It’s not like there are limited resources to only fix (X) or (Y) that forces us to choose which one gets fixed and which one does not.
6 Likes
No meaningful solution has been taken to even begin to address the huge problems with japan at top tier. The fact that japan type 10 is only top tier tank… Japans situtation has only gotten worse with each new update adding more bombers more things that japan has limited to no way of countering the type 81 is outranged by missles from helicopts just spawning in
It’s a good vehicle, that’s really not the issue here.
Though Japan will be royally screwed if Gaijin gives all of their reasonable subtree options to China.
4 Likes
In fact Japan has doesn’t have a lot left; Type 11 Tan-SAM Kai II (which is too strong atm, as with SPYDER-SR), Type 91 Kai missiles for Type 93 and ARH missiles for Type 81 (C). Thats about it and even Thailand can’t solve this issue. Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia can fill AA / SAM gaps as well (e.g.: M35 (M55) truck, RapidRanger MMS, M113A2 UMI - Later SPYDER-SR). Thailand would only added Type 76 (low tier) and M163 to fill gaps.
10 Likes
I’m hedging my bet that this leak is fake, these vehicles are too random.
The reception to the British T-90 was lukewarm at best, even a lot of British mains didn’t really want it.
And things like the French T-34-85 and Strv 2000 really give it away.
Okay, neat. If there is a proper bug report with proper primary source documents, alrighty, cool, be patient.