Its naval, nothing new.
1 Like
Sad but true.
If a vehicle has already received a response in the past and it’s overall situation or circumstances haven’t changed and / or the reason why it can’t move haven’t changed then we can’t duplicate a lot of the same answers.
Feedback is not disregarded at all. All of it is studied in detail and factored in.
1 Like
2S38 is the vehicle in question. The response from the devs was
“Lets try adding these internal modules first and then see”
Well… They didnt do enough to nerf it and the communities opinion hasnt changed.
10 Likes
Saying “our stats say it’s efficiency is fine” isn’t an answer to most people here in my opinion.
Being transparent with the statistics would be different.
But for some mysterious reason they haven’t been shared
3 Likes
The initial BR update thread stated 2PL was going to receive the DM53 (meaning initially, the devs had thought that 2PLs efficiency is not up to scratch), but that is no longer the case anymore (did the players suddenly start to play it better?), on top of that, DM43 still has not been fixed despite 2 reports and 3+ years of waiting.
Then there’s the 2S38, which is still going to be at the same BR as the Puma.
3 Likes
So what do you guys think of the j35xs? I still think it is kinda to high in br
It’s fine at that BR
J35XS had potential to be a tad OP in downtiers. So my opinion was always, try it at 11.0, see what happens,. Though that was before they decided to lower the BR of a load of aircraft that did not need moving… So… Who knows if anything has changed
Last I checked the F-14A IRAF has never received a response for being the same BR as the vanilla F-14A, so I’ll ask it here.
What makes the devs believe the IRAF should be a the the same BR as the vanilla F-14A when it has objectively better ARH missiles?
what even is the point in voicing our suggestions if we are getting ignored anyway?
at this point just announce and implement them, theres no need to ask for our opinion if theyre probably not even being read.
Managed democracy
1 Like
They did:
TLDR: They didnt want to move it up 2 stops in one BR change. Which I half get.
1 Like
“this is totally a democracy guys, trust us”
Sure, but that is a pretty weak excuse when the normal F-14A shares the same BR.
Kinda crazy its my first time here and im really caring about the br changes but i kinda feel disappointed
May I inquire in which way my comment suggesting BR cap go from 13.7 → 26.3 was factored in?
welcome to the club
this will be the norm, you should get used to it
Only time Im not disapointed by the BR changes is when there is new Sim Brackets added, and they have a 50/50 chance of being kinda stupid sometimes. But the last 2 have been pretty solid
For actually settling down the argument it could be designed to be something as an alternative F-14B, with R-73E but no precision guided A2G, and at 13.0 with the F-14B(presumably with AIM-9M)