I haven’t seen an update that satisfied me entirely updates get close with most if not all nations getting good additions and then 3 or so nations get nothing and it ruins it for me. Now if Denmark is added i will be happy. Unless we get the Finland treatment of being a cash cow nation with all our uniques either not added or given to another nation or left as event/prem, then id rather they dont add Denmark.
Also, has anyone noticed that, instead of fixing M735s that they themselves nerfed because they misread a report, they’d rather give out DM23 to vehicles that are currently using M735?
Lmao, I can’t, this is hillarious honestly.
6 Likes
Can anyone send me the link to the chinese leaker’s profile?
Abrams getting DM23?
@Smin1080p_WT Why is it that when we get told that our feedback will be listened to literally only 1% of the feedback is acknowledged?
3161 replies - 500~ (for duplicates/non-suggestions)
37 changes made.
That actually is close to 1% (Correction 1.39045472%) of all feedback listened to.
You can’t say that you value and listen to player feedback when you listen to that little.
8 Likes
You will see them on the forum under an hour when it drops on Chinese platforms. Also its like 1AM i think.
1 Like
Type 16 MCVs
https://tieba.baidu.com/home/main?id=tb.1.ff42df28.od1urJJKKQMaTINUcU3D4g?t=1532154447&fr=pb
No updates yet
1 Like
Lol, OFC that post is locked.
Anyways, I still don’t know why they think the IRAF should stay at the same BR as the vanilla 14A considering its weapons are better in nearly every meaningful way, and if the 14B doesn’t get 9Ms it will just be a crappier F-15.
Yeah their decision making here is incredibly odd.
Its not that hard to reverse the M735 change yet they just go and give them DM23…like what is their thinking here i genuinely want to know.
9 Likes
They don’t want to admit to being wrong. One thing that Gaijin hates above all else is having to admit that they’ve done a mistake. So they’d rather give a hand-out in hopes that the players forget it has ever happened.
3 Likes
Both of these are entirely untrue.
Sadly it’s not possible to implement every suggestion and provide detailed response to every one. There were over 3000 comments on the EN forum alone. All of which were factored in.
2 Likes
and considering the vehicles that consistantly get 200+ likes didnt change, the voting system clearly doesnt work
6 Likes
Evidently not, to say that is just a straight up lie
7 Likes
Factored and reviewed does not mean all of those can be implemented.
We reviewed all of the comments in the feedback thread. That is not a lie.
Sadly it’s not possible to implement each and every one or provided detailed responses to all of those.
3 Likes
Able to comment on why things like the AMX A-1A are still considered 11.3 Worthy? Its barely a side-grade to the Sea Harrier FRS1e at 10.7.
Also still no comment on why the Tornado Gr1, ASSTA1 and A200A are at 11.7 when 100% identical to the WTD61, A200 or MFG
5 Likes
Crew voices will be continuously expanded upon wherever possible over time. Sadly we don’t have any news to report on this one spesifcally.
4 Likes
But surely you’d address why you ignored the most voted on feedback for 2+ BR change blogs running.
Definitely wouldn’t ignore the community and then not provide any illuminating, behind the scenes information on why it would be you’d disregard feedback… Right?
8 Likes
Feedback for Naval got ignored completely, amazing
1 Like