M1A1HCs get M829A2, but M1A1 AIM, at the exact same BR, is still limited for some reason to the much worse KEW instead of the equivalent and historical KEW-A2 shell.
Ground “decompression” is still up to just 12.0, barely changing anything across the board…
They even went on to justify Leopard 2A5 being the same br as the Leopard 2A7s because “it’s still one of the best” while skipping the WHOLE POINT, which is that the range in capabilities among the top BR (now 12.0 instead of 11.7, like 2PL since they refused to give it DM53) is STILL TOO LARGE.
Why are a tank and its objective and absolute upgrade the exact same BR?
Baseline M1A2, broken Leclercs, underperforming Merkavas (despite the reload buff they will give it just not to fix its armor), some Challenger 2s at the same BR as the 2A7s and 122s…
Can’t they see? Can’t they see that half 12.0s shouldn’t be at the same BR as the other half of 12.0s? Can’t they see that the difference in capabilities between many 11.7s and 12.0s is too big to be just 0.3 BRs apart? Can’t they see that 12.0 is just not enough?
@Smin1080p_WT Why is the Su-25SM3 much higher BR than the Su-25T and Su-39 in ARB? It carries 2 R-73’s whereas the 25T/39 can carry 2 R-73’s and 2 R-60M’s.
I meant more giving one of them (say FGR.2 because its more realistic) their historical 9Ls and moving them up in BR to compensate, just to make them unique from each other in terms of Gameplay
This makes zero sense what the hell. Up it goes, but it doesn’t get a better shell - this thing is already worse than things like M1A1 HC/Click-Bait, BUT they got M829A2 and 2PL can’t have DM53???
