Isn’t it a country like Vietnam or Myanmar?
These two are also in ASEAN.
well, most of you listed are just export customers, for aligned nation, it would be North Korea
not much choices from Vietnam, most are just USSR vehicles, and the T-54M better goes to Israel
Not like they need to add all Asean countries tbh
to the labor camp for reeducation it is, i dont make the rules tovarish
1 Like
RWR AN/ALR-45(V) for A-7E 80’s tech in USA tech tree ?
A-129 International (p) only RWR older AH129CBT and AH-129D
Gaijin add NVG on Sea Harrier FA.2 ? good job
Definetly the most pressing issue with the FA2. Using it in all these night battles without NVG was a major issue
/s
1 Like
Setting the forums on fire, mostly
7 Likes
The reason why they are leaving things vague is that there must be something they cannot reveal. Especially if it is something related to the news…
1 Like
Continuing from the previous paragraph.
I think ASEAN’s accession to CN is a catastrophic thing
First of all, let’s think clearly, what is the meaning of a subtree? How are subtrees chosen?
- Political/military/historical, very closely linked:
Sweden: Finland/Denmark/Norway ------ are both friends of the Nordic Union
United Kingdom: Australia/Canada/India ------ Commonwealth, former belonging - Geopolitics is approaching, filling the TT gap:
France: Belgium/Netherlands/Luxembourg
Italy: Hungary/Romania - Language Region:
Germany: Switzerland ------ has a high proportion of German, and it is also related in various aspects
Most of our existing subtrees are designed to fill in the gaps, to increase TT’s competitiveness and make it more attractive while maintaining the uniqueness of TT as much as possible.
Okay, now that we’ve looked at the meaning of the subtree, let’s take a look at the “ASEAN subtree”
First of all, China has a complete military equipment system, self-developed and self-produced, completely Made In China, rich in variety, complete models, enough to fill China’s TT. If a subtree can exist, the options should be:
Pakistan ------ exports a large number of Chinese-made military products: Khalid, JF-17, for example
North Korea------The military field is closely cooperating and is a historical ally
Laos and Myanmar ------- a large number of Chinese-made vehicles, more improved
These sub-trees/vehicles have one thing in common: Chinese technology, made in China, adapted to the Chinese system, and Chinese flavor and characteristics.
Let’s look at ASEAN
There is no close historical relationship,
There is no close and high level of cooperation at the political and military levels.
Not a Core Ally,
Military equipment is not a Chinese characteristic
The purpose of adding subtrees is to expand and fill in the gaps while maintaining the uniqueness of the TT
And the ASEAN sub-tree, it doesn’t fit at all
There is no shortage of these vehicles in the Chinese TT, and these vehicles are not the product of Chinese technology, these vehicles are completely Western technology, which is very conflicting with the characteristics of the Chinese TT and is not in harmony.
With such a plan, it would be a disaster of balance/rationality
It would be more reasonable if they were put into the Japan TT. Japan has no more vehicles to add to the TT and is about to face stagnation, and Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Japan have close cooperation in military equipment, and it is obviously more reasonable to join JPTT.
And China’s TT deserves to be: North Korea, Pakistan, Laos, and Myanmar.
Even, the Chinese TT will be full in future versions without subtrees (if Gaijin is not lazy lmao)
Six lines, all of which can be filled, are very rich in vehicles.
ASEAN’s plan is really too bad, we only have five lines at the moment, and there are still a lot of potential Chinese-made vehicles that have not yet joined the WT, the emergence of ASEAN is very bad, which will squeeze out the space for China’s self-developed vehicles, I am very much against it.
25 Likes
Just with how big the pushback is, and that they know it’s there and that they still haven’t said anything disputing it just reinforces to me that it is real.
just what I want to say
2 Likes
Ukrainian Sub-TT for Russia with F16
5 Likes
I’m really concerned about this, because this is VERY bad
26 Likes
it should already happen if not that war, of course, no f16
If we see a wave of ASEAN NATO gear going to China, would that actually be all that surprising?
Their default to bodging ground trees is adding soviet T-series tanks. Look at Britain with theT-90. Even in air, they “bodged” Britains lack of “dogfighter” at 12.0 with a Mig-21 (though I sitll argue that the F3 is better than the Mig-21 in every respect)
Would you at all be surprised if they bodged the Su-27s issues with an F-16
Just… if they’re guessing the ASEAN stuff what else are they?
If y’all are wondering why your comments are getting deleted:
“3.8. It is not allowed to discuss threads closed by the Administration or Website Managers or any Users’ posts deleted by them, challenge or discuss corresponding actions of Administration, Moderators (and/or Global Moderators), Community Managers, Coordinators, and Game Masters in any form.”
The more you talk about your deleted comments, the more it will lead to more deletion.
3 Likes
The ONLY time that would be acceptable, is if its part of a number squish. Halve the SL gains and Halve the SL costs. If the numbers are just getting too high at top tier for reasonable balance/fun. Many games have done that in the past.
But if its just a flat 50% nerf. My god. They really want to just kill the game.
2 Likes
Imagine a company so incompentant it decides going back on promises is a good idea along with putting nations into questionable/outragous tech trees, cough cough signapore/indonesia to china cough cough.
What company would do that?
Oh wait… WELL WELL WELL LOOK WHO IT IS!
ITS GAIJIN ENTERTAINMENT!
22 Likes