Just with how big the pushback is, and that they know it’s there and that they still haven’t said anything disputing it just reinforces to me that it is real.
just what I want to say
2 Likes
Ukrainian Sub-TT for Russia with F16
5 Likes
I’m really concerned about this, because this is VERY bad
26 Likes
it should already happen if not that war, of course, no f16
If we see a wave of ASEAN NATO gear going to China, would that actually be all that surprising?
Their default to bodging ground trees is adding soviet T-series tanks. Look at Britain with theT-90. Even in air, they “bodged” Britains lack of “dogfighter” at 12.0 with a Mig-21 (though I sitll argue that the F3 is better than the Mig-21 in every respect)
Would you at all be surprised if they bodged the Su-27s issues with an F-16
Just… if they’re guessing the ASEAN stuff what else are they?
If y’all are wondering why your comments are getting deleted:
“3.8. It is not allowed to discuss threads closed by the Administration or Website Managers or any Users’ posts deleted by them, challenge or discuss corresponding actions of Administration, Moderators (and/or Global Moderators), Community Managers, Coordinators, and Game Masters in any form.”
The more you talk about your deleted comments, the more it will lead to more deletion.
3 Likes
The ONLY time that would be acceptable, is if its part of a number squish. Halve the SL gains and Halve the SL costs. If the numbers are just getting too high at top tier for reasonable balance/fun. Many games have done that in the past.
But if its just a flat 50% nerf. My god. They really want to just kill the game.
2 Likes
Imagine a company so incompentant it decides going back on promises is a good idea along with putting nations into questionable/outragous tech trees, cough cough signapore/indonesia to china cough cough.
What company would do that?
Oh wait… WELL WELL WELL LOOK WHO IT IS!
ITS GAIJIN ENTERTAINMENT!
22 Likes
Yes BUT not if you add the ammunition price increase
Is a double nerf and it isn’t needed
That is unneeded, I would agree. Infact, I kinda think having to pay for Ammo should just be removed at this point. It unfairly punishes some and others barely notice it
9 Likes
Believe me, is not worth it. Keep voicing your disappointment here but challenge the mods isn’t worth the ban
Regarding the potential economy nerf; maybe it is unwise of us to draw conclusions and lash out based on the preliminary, unconfirmed leak.
Maybe it’s an internal concept that may never actually come to be realized…
Maybe they backtrack and don’t implement the change even if they considered it…
Or maybe it isn’t even a reliable information after all.
So I would suggest to save the backlash for whenever there are more solid indications that this aberration may actually become a reality, in order to avoid getting heated over a potential false alarm.
Irregardless, one thing is clear- that nerf is NOT going to happen.
6 Likes
What i don’t understand is: they have tried this once and it didn’t work. In fact it incited the biggest revoult i can rememberso why try it again?
For once i don’t think Gaijin is that short sighted. The only reasonable thing to do imho is wait and see if that leak is real
1 Like
…how do we know this “leak” is real btw
You don’t, and you’re making a fuss about it.
5 Likes
Yeah. Lets wait for more detail before lighting the torches. But I will be making sure my pitch fork is sharpened sooner rather than later.
They did hint a while ago about changes to base bombing in ARB, so might eb related to that.
4 Likes
I can see them sneaking it into an update unannounced, then having to backtrack afterwards
10 Likes