SM-6 air launched
Aka welcome back AIM-54 😂😂😂
Polish vehiecles like the PT-91 maybe…
The most logical is a subtree for japan.
Now combine the two.
Yea which is one of the reasons why I grinding the ton out of rank 6 air atm for Japan.
Thats not how this works.
AESA radars are insane powerful im ensuring the missile gets solid guidance form the aircraft till the moment the missiles own radar takes over.
And if AESAs arent an issue, why not already adding them.
If a Eurofighter in its Tranche 1 configuration is “too technologicaly advanced”, pretty sure those were smins words (do correct me if im wrong) then this also applies to aircrafts such as the rafale and F-2.
But tag him and ask.
Ohh I see, I suppose that how Japan will get the F/A-18 too right ?
¯l_(ツ)_/¯
I just find it funny when Japan does finally gets’ it’s aircraft from it sub it will be one of the most mixed nations lol.
I mean F-15, F-16s, Su-27s, Su-30s, Gripens lmao
I do wonder when gaijin is to test the waters with PESA and AESA equipped aircraft.
At some point they will have to…
The F-16AM from BAC in the French tree did have a bug which was only patched in this update, where the player can have psuedo-array scan with the MAWS component attached, showing everyone that the radar picks up in the actual game interface alongside with their stats. So yeah, would not be surprising to see the function being tested soon.

It turns out quadcopters existed in the 60’s.
Always nice rlto be greeted by the Top Gear trio memes
Starting Today the weather will have increased Kamov showers.
Its expectet to last for at least a week before returning to clear skys.
People are advised to stay clear of the BR 11.0 regions if not prepared.
Also BOX
So assuming you get datalink (which early F-2s without J/ARG-1 don’t even have) you can now reliably bring the missile within 16km of the enemy, at which point they have the entirety of those 16km to avoid the missiles PD radar.
Keep in mind while datalink guidance with J/ARG-1 should keep up until the missile hits, in game (used on the F-15J(M)) it functions like any other ARH missile and takes away datalink once the missile tracks.
Easy, because there is so many aircraft without. Sure you can skip ahead to late APG-63(V)3 F-15s, but then there would be no APG-63(V)1 F-15s. They also likely want to give the latest F-15s or F-16s the latest weapons, which are obviously not fit for the game yet.
The F-2 is different, in that it has AESA throughout all variants, from the SARH only XF-2s, to the latest J/APG-2 and J/ARG-1 equipped F-2s. The F-2s are AESA aircraft that can reasonably be added with out current level of missile tech (even lower if they go for SARH only XF-2s).
Sure, but those aren’t too advanced for being AESA aircraft either, it’s other aspects too. It’s similar with the F-2, people seem to underestimate just how much better it is compared to our current F-16s in maneuverability and weapons capability as well, even in its early forms.
But even then it might have a place when added next to the mentioned Eurofighter and Rafale, which might not be too far off anymore, or just a bit earlier/later, depending on which variant they plan to introduce first.
The raaf hornets were made in USA idk where u got made in Australia from
they were assembled in Australia but that was probably because it’s easier to ship parts with instructions than fully built
A gentle reminder as we seen already not every US export will go to the US : )
nice. i need food for the type 81 xD
I think US and UK have equal claim to both and the best course of action is to give one of the f18 discussed to each tree

