Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1) (Part 1)

why give a source when you can just say the most wild of things

1 Like

Hey. There is currently nothing new to report with that.

1 Like

Sad, but hey thanks for the response, appreciate ya! ❤️

yeah and if you say it enough times it eventually becomes true.

1 Like

Yeah and? now design a tank with actual hull armor

Spoiler

:p

1 Like

What? The merkavas have plenty of hull armor? Don’t tell me you only get your info about the merkava from the war thunder model… lol. Put any other tank in the role that the Merkava currently has in Israel and it would be useless.

1 Like

yeah the uh… role in which they fight in mountainous terrain, and urban areas in largely LIC scenarios with little to no enemy armor present has never been done by any other tank ever, trust.

Spoiler

Because i know your writing up a whole paragraph down there imma be real with you its not that deep, and nor am i taking this convo seriously at all.

And it does that role perfectly, better than any tank so again your point is what? That the merkavas are terrible just because they don’t have their engine in the back of the MBT? Please stop commenting if you have no knowledge on the Merkava…

Ah the good ole “it isn’t that deep and I’m not taking this seriously” when you make a dumb statement. Have a good day man

you’re the one that chose to respond to it…

but hey i guess that’s to be expected from people who are overly passionate over mediocre tanks.

1 Like

I cant go through the stream atm due to reasons but did they mention anything about how they plan on doing ammo load-outs?

I don’t think so.

1 Like

@Smin1080p_WT
Good day. Is there any information available regarding this bug report?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/PW8tAm7AKXr7
It has been more than two years since it was accepted, but there have been no changes. Chaparral still has two absolutely identical rockets, so MIM-72E doesn’t make any sense.

2 Likes

The best designation currently is F-22A MLU.

Hi, @Smin1080p_WT
Just wondering why the Tan-SAM Kai got the mad dog feature removed on the ARH Missile. If this is intentional, why can the launchers with only ARH missiles still survive and are playable when the main radar truck is dead- despite being totally useless and weaponless.

Its being investigated currently.

1 Like

Which part of it? The mad dog feature or that the launchers allow you to stay alive with unusable missiles?

This would surely be 11.3 minimum? IMO anyways. It’s a lot more capable than the F-111A/F we have in-game. Sure, it’s massive and it’s a flying headphone warning if it comes ingame.

I’d love to see it and similar (well, there’s really only the Soviet/Russian supersonic bombers) bombers like it.

1 Like

Could you please clarify what is being investigated?

That the “Mad Dog” feature was removed (Eventho it was the main selling point and only real strength of the vehicle)

Or that the Launchers don’t die without the Radar like other multi sams?

As I posted long ago;

Why do people still believe the myth that “Merkava Mk.4 can’t possibly have good KE protection” because “it was made to withstand RPGs, not MBTs”? Israel is surrounded by MBT-armed nations that are either hostile towards it or have been at some point during Merkava Mk.4’s developement and service.

4 Likes