It isn’t a historical report either.
Until we have control over which flare buckets we use, it’s Gaijin’s choice of which ones to use in aircraft with universal flare buckets.
180 is correct. 4x 15 large, and 4x 30 standard.
240 is correct. 8x 30 standard.
It still isn’t correct because both of them have the same model and use the same countermeasure dispensers, so either both F-111s should have an option between large+normal or normal only OR they should be changed to either of those two options.
F-111 isnt alone on that. A lot of aircraft could use either LCM or CMs but in game they have one or the other. There is certainly times where Id like to pick between the 2.
Right now a visual texture is for the entire aircraft.
There is no countermeasure-only textures right now.
So the suggestion you would make is for them to change how vehicles are textured, and for countermeasures to have texture options that are automatically chosen depending on the choices you make.
Either way, it’s not an issue with the countermeasures itself.
Right now you can put flares in AN/ALE-40’s chaff tubes.
True, but it’s not like the US F-4E has large+normal countermeasures while the F-4F has normal countermeasures only. There is no reason why the F-111s should have a different arrangement.
Yep, that is a strange choice and considering the other difference between the F-111C and F-111F (6 vs 4 Aim-9Ls for example) It seems to just complicate BR placement for them even further.
@BasherBenDawg8
You can copy my radar report if you are interested. I see that moderators are not willing to check my reports despite several requests, since one of them get offended like children for a few sentences about the bug report on A-6E TRAM.
Can you please link me the Flight Manual you attached to your bug report?
You have it in PM, I sent it september 23. ;)
Ohhh right, I’ll go grab it then, thanks haha!
Wrong title mate ;) you wrote F-111F still has a placeholder RWR
I originally wrote Radar but the whole page refreshed earlier after I wrote it all up and was waiting for your reply for the link. Then I had a brain fart trying to fill it in lol. I’ll fix that now haha
Sidenote: main forums post updated to include updated links.
Already reported internally with that source.
I see, thank you for letting me know. I was under the impression it wasn’t given the old report wasn’t acknowledged or anything haha. Thank you for letting us know, have a great day!
It’s been over a year… still has the F-5E’s radar… :(
devs too busy making premiums instead unfortunately
Got a response form Smin today after prompting him, nothing new it seems… slowly reaching the two year mark:
Sadge
RWR also is still wrong, copy paste APS-109 and named after the RWR that should only be on the Australian Aardvark.
Yep, we have an “passed as a suggestion” report on it, and this thread originally was dedicated to addressing both issues. Today I simply reorganized it to mainly address the radar issue, as I find it to be the bigger problem alongside being more obvious of a problem for gaijin to address