There is no where for Poland to be added as a sub-tree, but I do agree on the Central European part, Czechoslovakia+Poland makes a powerful nation
3 Likes
To be fair the way Gaijin does techtrees. this “central european techtree” would need a face nation, Poland is just that. I’d agree that Poland could do well alongside the Czech Republic for example, like it was already suggested.
2 Likes
I’d prefer @Fjord his idea.
Bucharest Nine TT.
Ukraine is added to Japan through indonesia and thailand.
One day our nations will win the fight for a home/tree.
The people who look only at the top tier MBT and throw all he domestic equipment out because it had a Bushmaster or some other hated weapon in game. Cant fight forever.
4 Likes
Slovakia carries they have modified 2A42’s that use bushmaster ammo lol
Depends on what nations are added, we already have a problem of nations needing subtrees to stay future proof and some nations have nothing that will make them unique and worth grinding.
Seriously who’s grinding Sweden for the Gripen? Same argument could be used for the Leos with Germany ect ect.
Biggest thing is first getting the current nations set up to be future proof before we add more nations so we don’t have to add fictional stuff or leave a nation with massive gaps for years cough cough Israel SPAA
Face symbol
There is NO need to play Germany.
You can literally play every nation besides the big 4 for the same experience.
I’d say for WW2 that’s the main pull but for cold war and modern they need a lot more for sure
And Indonesian C&P will fill Japan as well.
BTW yall, what are the chances the Leopard 2RI will be the only unique Indonesian tank added?
- 100%
- 80%
- 60%
- 40%
- 20%
- 0%
0
voters
I should really get back to working on the West Slav ground tree
1 Like
Try to convince me with a Poland TT.
Nothing, which is sadly accurate to reality. The tank Pakistan trialed was the same that was used to first test the APU and A/C intended for the Oplot-T, so while it’s technically an Oplot-M by name, it’s functionally an Oplot-T.
I would’ve preferred had they instead added the Oplot-P which would’ve featured revised side ERA protection and (optionally) removed Varta APS, but that was somehow too much work/cost for them despite a player making an accurate Oplot-P model in only a few days:
2 Likes
Far to many people get caught up in the idea a tree is just a single vehicle. This isn’t WOT where only one vehicle can be brought, every mode but one is line up based.
Plenty of nations have Shermans and other US vehicles hasn’t hurt their player counts one bit. Same with Germany and Leo’s.
Because a tech-tree is all the vehicles that make it up and the line ups that can be made from them.
3 Likes
And that’s my point gaijin is allergic to unique vs copy and paste
2 Likes
You’re forgetting some people are only interested in some trees for one vehicle.
Hell I grinded Japan just for the type 93
So that’s not entirely truem
There is nothing unque about Finland, the only unique thing is the low tier donk cannon.
All other Finnish vehicles are premium or event.
And DONT TELL ME THAT STUPID Russian tank at 8.0 or something is unique. It’s not.
I mean the most well known Indonesian vehicles like the Harimau MT or Badak FSV are domestic developments. At the very least I can’t imagine they release Indonesian ground vehicles without at least one variant of Harimau MT.
2 Likes
Bet
1 Like
You mean 9.0 the T55M with the only difference being a single round?