T-84 BM Oplot-P: Just as my nation, I was built for a purpose

T-84 BM Oplot-P

Pakistan Flag

Just as my nation, I was built for a purpose

image1

History

Pakistani relations with Ukraine started in full swing in the early 1990s. In 1992, the foundations for formal diplomatic ties were laid.

Economic ties ran deep with respect to the nation’s populace and food imports. However, behind closed doors, a deeper understanding was being reached mutually. During Pakistan and China’s co-development of the Type-90 II (which later came to be the MBT-2000/Al Khalid), a version of the initial series of 4 of the Pakistani prototypes was trialled with the KMDB 6TD-II 1200hp engine.

After being impressed with the performance, the engine was adopted into the standard service models of the Pakistani Al Khalid and, as far as I know, the Chinese export models as well.

At the same time, the late 1980s and 1990s were a time when the world was preparing for the dawn of the next century, and Pakistan was not planning to be left behind. They held extensive trials of multiple Main battle tanks to supplement and work alongside their workhorse, the Al Khalid.
The trials saw the testing of the M1 Abrams from the USA (1988), which performed horribly, overheating and missing most of the shots taken.

image

Alongside many others, even the PT-91 was under consideration. However, none could really stay strong in the rough and harsh climate of the Pakistani deserts. Hence, they were all rejected.

In the late 1990s, after trials, Pakistan and Ukraine signed the biggest arms deal of that period of time. For a sum of 650million USD, Pakistan acquired 320 T-80UD (Objekt 478B) tanks from Ukraine. Ukraine, while promising to deliver, lacked capital and materials. To add to that, many of the tanks that were promised to be delivered were missing parts, sometimes even whole turrets, and as Russia was not keeping to provide parts to Ukraine, especially the cast turret of the T-80UD, Ukraine used parts from their T-84 line to complete the tanks. This gave rise to a first batch of deliveries of standard T-80UDs with the 6TD-1 1000hp engine and TVD sights. The next batch was, according to demand, equipped with the 1200hp 6TD-II engine.

Then came the batch with missing parts. The welded turret design from the T-84 was used here to complete the tanks, giving rise to the new Objekt 478BE (T-80UD/BE). This turret was overall better protected than the welded turret and is distinguishable by the polygonal shape and the shifted position of the smoke dischargers from the front to the sides in quad packs.

T-84 Oplot

Building on the trust and ties of the past, in response to the Pakistani Al Haider MBT program, Ukraine took the initiative and submitted its flagship Oplot-M for trials in 2015.

The vehicle did not perform according to requirements, and Pakistan ordered a modified vehicle to better fit their needs. Ukraine could not deliver in time to compete in the contest, and eventually Pakistan ended up purchasing the VT-4 from China and acquiring TOT to domestically produce it as the Al Haider. Ukraine did not give up however, and in time, they presented the modified Oplot-P prototype to the Pakistan Army.

The new MBT featured a lighter overall weight and a different Armour configuration. The initial prototype seems to have mounted the Varta in the factory; however, they did away with it in the demonstration. The vehicle dropped the multiple heavy, full-length ERA side skirts from the Oplot-M and instead prioritised a much smaller amount of half-length Nizh ERA blocks. The rest of the rear compartment was instead covered by Rubber screens with metal sheets bolted in the mid-section.

The Nizh by itself, according to OEM documents, can heavily reduce penetration of shaped charges and KE penetrators depending on the round.

Nizh-1M

image

During the demonstration, the Oplot-P was not equipped with metal covering sheets on top of the Turret ERA blocks, nor the hanging rubber panels commonly seen on the Oplot-M. However, we can see from a video from the Smithsonian advertising the firepower of the T-84 BM Oplot. Interestingly, instead of a Ukrainian Oplot-M, the video showcases the Oplot-P, albeit now matured into what could be called a production-ready vehicle.

image

It now sports a new desert camouflage, presumably for desert trials in Pakistan, and mounts the metal sheet covers and rubber pre-detonator (for CE penetrators) screens combination on the turret. The Varta is still neglected, however, since it has outlived its usefulness in the current day and age.

The Oplot-P is the natural progression of the Oplot series of tanks, and as other nations, such as China, have learnt from Pakistani requirements and innovation (JF-17 development), the Oplot has now come to its new stage, valuing smarter armour choices and lighter loads on the engine and transmission block in order to not only increase mobility and agility, but also drivetrain lifespan and decrease overall maintainance of the running gear.

List of differences between Oplot-M/T and Oplot-P
Camo

Oplot-P ---------------------------------------- Oplot-T

Production standard

Demonstration standard


Varta APS

Oplot-P ---------------------------------------- Oplot-T

(It should be a modification)


ERA and armour

Oplot-P ---------------------------------------- Oplot-T

Yellow = marching configuration
Green = differences in ERA
Green* = not mounted yet, but still different from the Oplot-T
Blue = just not mounted yet


Technical Specifications

Crew: 3 (Commander, Gunner, Driver)
Mobility
Weight: ~49t
Power: 1,200hp
Top speed: 70kmph (reverse: 32kmph)
Power/weight: 24.45hp/t
Suspension: Torsion bar
Length: 7.075m
Width: ~3.65m (less than M/T since the heavy Duplet was replaced with the lighter Nizh-1M)
Height: 2.8m

Armament
Main gun: 125 mm
Autoloader: Yes, 6.5s reload, 28 rounds
Secondary gun(s): 1 x 7.62mm KT-7.62 MG, 1 x 12.7mm KT-12.7 MG
Elevation: -4/15
Traverse: 360°
Gun sight: 2.7x–12.0x
Laser Range Finder: Yes
Thermals: Yes
NVD: Yes

Ammunition

  • 125mm
    Count: 46
  • 3BK18M
  • 3OF26
  • BTA4
  • GP125
  • 3BM42
  • domestic Pakistani 125mm DU ammunition
  • 7.62mm
    Count: 1250
    Rate of fire: 700 rpm

  • 12.7mm
    Count: 450
    Rate of fire: 700 rpm

Visual References
Videos

https://youtu.be/mthYlTswcvI
https://youtu.be/5mjbo7Un7zQ
https://youtu.be/rNv-KnFP5tI

Sources
3D Model (custom-made from the T model)

Extra pictures available for free on request

image

Do you want to see this in game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
7 Likes

+1 the more oplots the merrier

1 Like

Hmm, I’ve a Déjà-vu XD

4 Likes

hehe i dunno wat u mean ;)

hm i wonder what thread that model was made for

+1 bajillion

2 Likes

i wonder if i shared the Oplot-P (late) version model as well…

4 Likes

Dynamic protection and the manufacturer’s website are incorrectly specified. UAM has no connection with the supply of dynamic protection for Oplot tanks. Only Microtech supplies dynamic protection “Nizh” and “Duplet” (KhSChKV-34, KhSChKV-19). https://microtek.com.ua/

1 Like

well internal ukrainian defense production aside, UAM seems to have partaken in the development at least

+1, tbh insane how Gaijin mistook the Oplot-P with Oplot-M and tried to argue back.

5 Likes

How did she participate in the development when the company was founded in 2018? Given that the dynamic protection itself was adopted in 2003

im not sure but they promote the Nizh and Duplet on their official site and have the brochures for them.
maybe they co-produced at one point?

More Oplot’s you say? I’m in! +1

1 Like

No, they weren’t. They are completely different companies. Moreover, I couldn’t find any dynamic elements from UAM on the Internet. On the other hand, there are many photos and videos of Microtech. These are different companies, and UAM has nothing to do with BM Oplot.

I mean im not really affected either way but…

Okay these aren’t UAM they’re UA microtech.

+1

Amazing suggestion, especially with the well made models for the Oplot-P in both variants.

I really hope this gets implemented, especially if they can do it as revenue share with the user models.

1 Like

УПМ - УКРАЇНСЬКІ ПЕРЕДОВІ МІКРОТЕХНОЛОГІЇ ІМЕНІ В.О.ХИТРИКА(UAM). UAM - UKRAINIAN ADVANCED MICROTECHNOLOGIES NAMED AFTER V.O. KHITRYK. Once again. The company was founded in 2018 (registered in 2017). Duplet and Knife (KhSChKV-34, KhSChKV-19) - adopted for service in 2003. That’s all, no other elements are used on Oplots, especially those presented by HKChPWSH - which in fact do NOT exist, and if they do exist, please show me a photo of the HKChPWSH elements (I’ll tell you right away that you won’t find them).

+1. Should have been this one as squadron and not a cheap ahh C&P.

@Yoshi_UA calm down lad. To begin with, author may not be or was not concerned so much with the depth of the state of Nizh/Duplet ERA in the game. To be frank, I wouldn’t say the subject of ERA manufacturer (Microtek/UAM) matters that much simply because numbers of one another match most of the time. The only important difference is how these numbers are represented: with inclusion of specific projectiles divided by efficiency (UAM’s brochure) or general compilation of efficency against KE/CE projectiles (Microtek’s sources).

Not to say it doesn’t affect efficiency of current Oplots, and any tank with Nizh ERA in general, but I wouldn’t really blame author given the density and ambiguousity of the subject.

The author pointed to non-existent dynamic protection. It only exists in visualizations and brochures. Therefore, since the figures were given in brochures, this raises doubts. There were no tests, videos, or photos of HKChPWSH elements on the Internet. This company (UAM) appeared in 2018, which already contradicts logic. It is necessary to indicate the correct manufacturer and its elements, and only then will it be a good and correct offer.

Maybe we can still get this one in the future. Disappointed we didn’t get it from the beginning, but I still really want it! +1

1 Like