I think you added on accident a “.” between the 15 :P
5 Likes
Wouldn’t be surprised if they added that to Russia at this point.
2 Likes
It’s American made/designed? Why would they added to Russia that makes no sense
What does make sence in this game?
Maps which don’t allow for flanking due to red borders that makes your tank explode,
Invisibility frames when you spawn in a warzone,
Overperforming ERA (only for Russia),
Counter munitions not being added due to “balance” (Where are my NATO APFSDS shells that were meant to slice through Russian ERA like butter?),
etc… etc…
2 Likes
Idk give me enough time and I’ll find somewhere to shoot to pen something with the 35
Day 1163 of waiting for Polish tech tree, haters will keep hating 🤞
11 Likes
it is possible to happen in this week ?
probably next week i feel
1 Like
the shells are there, they just don’t do what they’re supposed to
Me over here (still) coping for A-4M Super Mike and AV-8B DA for the US, and the Mirage IIING for France
(Please Gaijin, they’re all I have left)
Funny enough, the AMV is dirtier than the regular C1 ingame
1 Like
The thing is, that would be pretty hard to implement technically.
Because the normal map is always going to remain the same and thus the scars will always be there. They would probably have to have completely different textures for each few stages of condition.
Or they just just like brighten the texture a lot, but then it would look even more unrealistic than now and just like clay
I think the real solution here is just retexturing and remodeling a lot of tank which just have horrible models in the first place. They have done this a little but, but it is clearly not enough
Watched a clip of someone doing cannon CAS with F-86F-2.
It is interesting that we skipped from 9.3 to 10.0 in 9 months (Dec 18 to Sep 19) and to 11.3 in 15 months (Dec 18 to Mar 20)
But we are filled Rank VIII in a range 12.3 to 14.3 for just over 3 years (Dec 22 to Mar 26)
Turning back into my point, I guess they should have started with J-5, MiG-17AS, F-86H-10. Then we would have filled Rank VIs all over the trees
Honestly, leapfrogging off of your idea: US TT (I’m only doing the US TT since that’s about all I’m knowledgeable on lol) should’ve gone F-86F-2 → F-86H-10 → F-100C → F-100D → F-4C (and from there with split F-4Es, and the current F-15s, and so forth).
Then in-between F-100s and F-4s, that’s where the Crusaders, Voodoo, Delta Dagger, etc could’ve been implemented here and there. Add on top of that more Navy Phantoms than just the F-4J and F-4S, and things would actually be better off lol
3 Likes
I would probably group F-86 lates and move to rank V, move F-4C to rank VI, add F-4D in place of F-4C at rank VII and finally add a F-4E Late at Rank VIII, 12.3
Other aircraft can be scattered on other lines. There are a lot of missing aircraft with event vehicles place being full times full
1 Like
-
The USA aviation tech tree missing USN fighter aircraft 8.7 ~ 9.0 before F3H-2
-
Domestic USAF F-100A (early & late production equipment)
-
F-8 Crusader early variant before F8U-2
-
Shenyang J-6 with 2nd gen IR Air-to-Air Missile for researchable vehicles
In my opinion, 3 nations (USA, USSR & UK) lack 1st gen fighter aircraft with Air-to-Air Missile
1 Like
is the mirage f1c-200 still a good purchase?
No cuz the tech tree ones are prettier
1 Like
I’d say talismaned Mirage F1CT is better choice due to having much better RWR.
I would gladly sacrifice one cannon for better awareness/survivability.
3 Likes
you also sacrifice the centerline missile and all their greatness