On the other hand there to 0 relation that let Germany claim it. For the UK its dominion and commonwealth relations that had them on the same side of all.of War Thunder but for Germany it only thing they have is Poland used Leopards, which is part of the old “tech rules”.
Even more so considering the invasion of Poland by Germany is the official date of WW2 for most nations. There is a reason why Germany’s sub-tree is a neutral nation as WW2 is major factors into sub-tree placement unless there literally no other option.
The 1 ton weight isn’t going to make a massive difference. The SEPv2 however gets a LWS and 2x as many smoke pops, the latter is a significant advantage in the current CAS heavy meta.
This is personal, but I prefer the Challengers over the ZTZ99s any day of the week.
My top tier China experience is now pretty much M1A2T → backup M1A2T → HQ11 or CS/SA5 → maybe CAS and leave.
the trzyniec from what i know has 0 correlation to britain so why its on the british tree as a premium i have no clue. and yes your right about the leopard
Yeah, not a fan of trials either outside of vers specific cases.
But specific variants (like K2NO? I think it was different from standard K2) are those cases. It’s a variant made for Norway, so I’d say it should be treated as Norwegian the same way any other prototype made for Norway would. Where the company that made it is from is, at least to me, secondary.
The 1 ton weight isn’t going to make a massive difference. The SEPv2 however gets a LWS and 2x as many smoke pops, the latter is a significant advantage in the current CAS heavy meta.
the sepv2 is also played by americans.
personally i also prefer the challengers over the ztz (i dont own the ztz) but thats because im british and will glaze my challys to all hell
if i did have top tier china my experience would be m1a2T to j10c or j15t to ztz99a then possibly the z10 then leave
Yeah, not a fan of that either. But at least this can be attributed to terrible research. For example they claimed it was prototyped (it wasn’t), and the F-16 was trialed by Japanese pilots (it wasn’t).
I think here they mainly just decided misinformation is somehow better than backtracking.
Depends. The Vidar was added, but that wasn’t top tier so who knows, and the T/FA-50s weren’t added either. Still I could see it maybe after the Korean tree is there, especially since they also have no shortage of MBTs.
Well put it this way, the Vidar was actually used by the Norwegians.
The K2NO yes has a different trophy APS and turret than the standard K2 which also arrived for Norways trials with the Korean Turret and APS and that’s the one painted in the Norwegian camo.
Yes it’s unique but it’s also only a trial vehicle. Yes technically with what Sweden currently has they have 3 Leo’s left.
Strv 123
Strv 123A
Leo 2A8NOR
Air wise it’s just F-35 and I fully expect multiple nations to get the actual Gripen E before Sweden does since Sweden doesn’t have a Gripen E they have a tech demonstrator from 2016 making it one of the oldest aircraft among the European nations at top tier.
As of right now a Canadian Gripen E would be like the Japanese F-16. If we got to fly any it would have been an older Gripen as the E didn’t exist at the time of the review theat locked in the F-35 the second time and I had yet to see any news of our pilots flying one after this new review started.
Eh, in a few months here we should learn if the mixed fleet rumors come true, after the trade talks with US and Mexico in June or July (can’t remember what month it is happening)
