Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1) (Part 1)

Sorry for the ping again but given your prior comment, Finland and Sweden in general doesn’t have a equivalent vehicle to fill the 4.3 hole that the KV filled and the KV-1A at 4.7 is not an equivalent exchange so why can’t they get something to fill that hole?

Then sadly there is no evidence of technical compatibility with a AGM triple rack.

So are you saying that all of this could change the devs minds? Cause tbf it seems like more people would like the same treatment as the Israeli Merkava.

It doesn’t take away from the old nations either because that vehicle is unique because it’s on their TT. It’s unique still because it has that other nations lineup to play with still.

Alright I’ll take my leave

2 Likes

Its more than possible that future vehicles will be added to fill gaps in any tree. However at this time, there are no plans to speak of regarding the event KV-1B. As we have already answered numerous times now.

If that changes, then we would clarify as such.

1 Like

Honestly i wouldnt buy it, i do really like the J35 and all but with the lack of care i know that will be shown towards it im not interested

This^

Once nations get a subtree, they should have all vehicles represented by that subtree in THEIR home tree. Even if it is “copy paste” of an existing vehicle that would be considered “exlusive”. Digital scarcity is dumb, just add the vehicles as GE premium if gaijin still wants to make coin on certain things.

image
This should be in the British tree for South Africa once it was announced as a subtree. This one is one of many examples

8 Likes

can you answer my pobit question mr smin

If the CF-105 means a TT Arrow tank, my money.

I’d love for it to be the Mk 2 but… Even if it is WT possable, as it suggestable at least I have a feeling we’d only get the Mk 1. So the better CF-105 would only be a dream, eh, TT one in the UK is already pushing it for a Canadian vehicle going by the trends.

Lack of care? How dare you, I’m insulted that you think gaijin totally doesn’t press at least 1 button before adding another unfinished draken for money smh.

wait ive been focused on the f16 does this mean we could get an aussie abrams for the brits

Not an event vehicle so it’s far more likely

If there is direct evidence the Block 52 PoBIT had technical compatibility a report can be made with evidence here: Community Bug Reporting System

Surely if I would ask the MoD/BW Museum Koblenz/BAAINBw this would be source enough or?

Hey man ive got awful news, i recently was given many CF 105 documents and the bad news is that it used the GAR 1A and GAR 1C missiles

And sparrow IIDs

small problem is that not one of these missiles was ever serviced or do i have documents to give their performance
image
so unfortunately it will be kinda mid, even at a low br
Theres a weird bug with the falcons that they are just incapable of tracking a target anywhat accurately to the point they miss a B52 that is not doing anything to stop it, no turns or countermeasures
kinda saddening

Yeah, that one I 100% support. Moving them completely like this would just change the event in such a significant way that it doesn’t seem fair anymore, for the same reason that ahistorical vehicles are hidden and not removed.

Anyways as long as future cases like the Merkava Mk.1 aren’t ruled out I’m happy.

1 Like

I don’t think anyone is asking for them to be moved but to make a copy like you did with the Merkavas that’s all people want

2 Likes

britain should be the thanos nation collecting all the infinity stones
Challengers
T90
Abrams
Leopard 2
Leclerc

No, that one’s on me, I made that example alongside the more reasonable option. Sometimes I can come up with way worse ideas than Gaijin too.

well i wouldnt expect it then because the f16 platform has theoretical capbility of 8 missiles but not specifically the pobit and im guessing i wouldnt be able to source something from a block 72 for a block 52 even though the main airframe remains mostly unchanged

Nobody is asking for them to be moved we just want a copy of the vehicle on its home nation. The old event should be unique being able to be used with the old nation but locking it permanently to one nation is silly.

6 Likes