Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1) (Part 1)

Yay, welp guess we can see a swathe of pings for you soon

Genuinely, what is the road going forward for the American Top-tier? People want the F15EX but even that isn’t going to be any better: same old 120DoAs, no over-the-shoulder radar, same old airframe. It’s going to be the 15C GE all over again. USA has no other aircraft that I can think of before heading into gen 5.

1 Like

Did you bring back some bread for us ?

Spoiler

Sorry had too lol

1 Like

Honestly these times where nothing is going on are nice too because since you’re not waiting for anything you’re never disappointed, impatient or frustrated

Let me just get one more star and go full PvE (1 kill, 12 respawns, OSA-transparent trees) gameplay on the “who knows whenever it returns” Air EC

Did you enjoy your vacation? Sorry to bug you about this but why did you guys remove the Maddog mode from the Tan-Sam Kai? It was one of its best perks over other multi-SAMs.

1 Like

did you have a nice vacation?

also your lucky theres no major for a while cause once news on it starts you will not hear the end of the challenger 2 from me

also queue times for USA are still really fun

odd I get in straight away but 9/10 games are over halfway done

are you on CIS aswell, cause i tried that and couldnt fly without being lagged into the ground

nope EU and US

Lucky

1 Like

50% sales expected this month?

I cant wait for them to replace Air RB with this undercooked mess, so when you DO get into a dogfight (1 in 10 matches) either you or the enemy is killed my SPAA instead of an actual 1 for 1 fight…

nice

1 Like

Its an issue under investigation currently.

The devs have just been actively working on the nuclear mode, which contains a lot of complexity.

1 Like

Thanks for the reply. Regarding the Ninth Wave update, I was wondering what the internal stance is on “Brochure Specs.”
​We see the Pantsir SM-SV and Kh-38MT (while not combat proven) implemented with their absolute peak advertised performance (40km / 1700ms), while the IRIS-T SLM (which is combat proven) remains limited to roughly 50% of its documented manufacturer range. Is there a specific reason why “Export/Expo Specs” are treated as factual for some nations, while others are held back by more conservative balancing?

Dunno about brochure specs, but we know the Kh-38ML is combat proven and the MT is just the same missile but an IR seeker, so performance wouldn’t be different to begin with

The rest of your question is valid, IMO.

1 Like

The in game modeling doesn’t match the seeker’s specifications.

Day 1136 of waiting for Polish tech tree

2 Likes