Canada has literally nothing as far as i can tell.
Aussies only have EAP Tigers.
New Zealand, however, used Westland Wasps, SH-2F Sea Sprites, and SH-2G Super Seaprites. I dont know if these were armed with their ss.11s and mavericks.
Don’t worry if they are feeling generous they will give them another shitbox with broken FM and guns
the Python-3 does not have IRCCM bro it have less resistance to flares than the 9L.
If trailer illuminator + vehicle launcher (similar to Churchill Crocodile) is possible then M727 Hawk is possible. Of course Nike is impossible.
And I’m skeptical Hawk will be a top BR something
7 Likes
So outside of 1 or 2 from Canada and Australia, New Zealand would give most of the Helis.
Kinda a funny image if we continue on with what I’ve reached earlier.
- Canada tree
- has helicopter tab
- looks inside New Zealand.
Thinking about it that’s really good for New Zealand as usually they are brushed off as it’s thought all they’d bring is two tanks and a LAV.
Like I said they’d have to change their all-in-one policy first, but yes that could work just fine.
I think Hawk could work fine at top BR. Problem is it isn’t an all-in-one system like Pantsir or ADATS so it isn’t going to be as effective at very low flying fast moving targets.
Their A-4K were modded to use mavericks.
Thats why I said THE VERSION that DOES have IRCCM lol.
israel does not have other version of the Python-3 haha, thats china bro and is the PL-8B and PL-8C which is way better than the original israeli Python-3, because they made it in china with chinese components and technology.
israel just made the Python-4 to replace the Python-3 and to compete with the R-73, israel was the first country in the world to develop a missile to counter the soviet R-73.
You are thinking of the F136 which was a joint program with GE. The US didn’t feel threatened by it as it was a joint engine. It was canceled because it was a very expensive program for the actual performance it offered. Now there is the XA100 which is much better than both the F135 and 136 and even then it’s iffy about being integrated because of budgetary reasons.
I’m a little worried gaijin forgot another 1st & 2nd gen fighter late 1945 ~ 1950’s
Currently USA tech tree missing fighter aircraft 7.0 BR from US Navy and F-86 Sabre armed with AIM-9B from USAF
Su-27 tomorrow for Sukhoi Saturday :)
1 Like
FH Phantom and FJ-1 Fury for the USN is what I’m guessing you’d be referring to, they’d be neat at the 7.0 and below region. There’s also the F2H-4 which is faster than the F2H-2 and has AIM-9s. As well as the lack of the FJ-2, FJ-3, and FJ-4 Fury fighters which the USN line should’ve have almost a decade ago back when Gaijin was deathly afraid of letting the line actually be good (for anyone who wasn’t here for it this is referencing pre-supersonic days when the USN fighter line was almost unplayable garbage). Oh, and of course a tech tree F11F Tiger.
4 Likes
You forgot Czechoslovakia in Warsaw mate. Other then that…yeah. Not sure about the Baltic states…they would be more like a sub-TT to Warsaw nations TTs
MH60R for Australian navy with 8 hellfire’s and potentially OH58 with hellfires
Honestly I dont forsee anymore seperate nations
They did say they were figuring out what to do with Poland so theres still a chance imo.
Idk I think the games congested enough tbh with 10 nations and since its a good number of stuff to choose from I think they stop there, if they add anymore itll be a bunch of different nation thrown together so long as it makes sense
Pre-MSIP can take AAM-5 (just without JHMCS)
F-15SJ with AAM-5 (sub 898 serial is SJ some are retrofitted, but not 806 in the first screen cap)
Also the fact that AAM-5 is compatible with the base LAU-114 launcher would mean that the late models of the F-1 can technically carry both AAM-3 and AAM-5 since they were retrofitted with LAU-114 when modified to carry AIM-9L. I know they expanded the amount of LGB on the Tornado because it’s “theoretically possible”, so it would be interesting to see.
As for AIM-120 it should be theoretically possible to carry it on a pre-MSIP that went through a separate IRAN.
Top is LAU-106/A and bottom is LAU-106A/A. The 106/A only has the AIM-7 umbilical while the A/A has the AIM-120 one too.
Compare that to a proper J-MSIP which has a dedicated AAM-4 umbilical that can take an adapter to fire AIM-120 as well.
LAU-106A/A
So the F-15SJ that can carry AAM-5 are likely to have received LAU-106A/A during the same IRAN without going through the J-MSIP modifications.
Also don’t forget about bombs.
6 Likes