Absolutely agree!!
Israel would’ve been alright after Gaijin added some other full rank I-VIII capable trees before it, I was quite upset when they announced it two years ago before CZ, PL and YU…
3 Likes
It was a mistake to do that.
1 Like
Tank designated M48 & M60 are not configured in the same manner of the Magach 3 forward.
So they are separate tanks.
This is like claiming T-54 & Type 59D1 are the same tank.
It would be rather weird to see it as premium given its better protection and possibly better speed than T-80U with removed UFP weakspot and gunner&commander being able to adjust their position to make them go more into the hull than turret.
Oh it would be also harder to kill than most soviet tanks because I am pretty sure it has protected fuel tanks and driver, meaning it wont die from fuel explosion like any other soviet tank 90% of the time.
Easy rule of thumb is that its always a Magach 5 because it comes from the A5. 6 is because it’s a 60 of some kind, either A1 or RISE. Gal because it has the Gal FCS, BATASH because that’s the acronym for the applique protection kit. 7A and 7C I think are basically just standardizations of other turret armor arangements, and the Magach 8 is also known as the Sabra as it was intended for export.
That isnt entirely true either, the hungarian version has a similar role yes…
But nr 1 germany has no APS
2. puma ≠KF41
3. I am not saying german needs necesarily a ifv variant. As long as germany gets any variant its fair lile the 120mm version
I am just naming the australian Kf41 currently because it doesnt have a home in other countries and UK has their own indigineous equivalents as well
But it is prototype. Prototypes are usually premium vehicles
Except there isn’t enough room in USA for 30 tanks of another country’s.
That and Israel can expand far beyond its current form.
It has the most vehicles out of other options after all.
1 Like
Yeah, but we don’t need more p2w vehicles
I mean
There is no rule for whether a prototype will be a premium or in the tech tree.
4 Likes
All the M48 Magachs basically came out of a dire need for heavy armor in Israel, some of the first being renamed from captured Jordanian M48A1’s, as well as A1(or 3? I forget)'s from West Germany that were surplus by then. Magach 3 is basically the standardization for transmission and engine.
The Type 59 is just a T-54A, but okay.
1 Like
True, just look at the PSO
Why P2W? It will be on higher BR so it will meet M829A4 equipped abrams and DM73 equipped Strv123
Object 906, 775 and 685 in the regular TT
They literally aren’t…
How?
1 Like
Yeah, I am sure it would be higher BR, just like the F-4S is a higher BR than the F-4J
Its good vehicle but giving it to unexperienced players will make them seems too bad in eyes of those players all while good players will be dominating, only resulting to constant arguments if BRs are justified.
This guy pretty much is right though I wouldnt make assumptions, if placed above 11.7 it will have UFP that 11.7 tanks can pierce up to 1(or 2 dont remember exactly) km in the ERA. So it would be like Leopard 2A5 with less penetration and less size, maybe with better FCS, maybe even mobility.