And the version that people wanted the most, the one with Milans, was explicitly avoided in favour of the one without, showing that Gaijin really does not care.
1 Like
We have for years the biggest SPAA gap, and lot of other real SPAA are possible to come in place of an IFV treated like a SPAA x)
And still now we have a 5.3/8.3 gap, still big.
it really is, and yes i get it is a premium at this point I would take a premium if it gets me something better then the warrior
Guys the F-117 is coming!!! Truely showing off its stealth
9 Likes
The AMX-10P is not premium.
It’s funny because La Royale was Frances big update. But they figured to announce the CV9030, BTR-80, and Freccia at the start.
The VBCI-2 just being a “surprise” they quickly got developed after enough complaining.
2 Likes
Yep. Hence me labeling stuff as “sub-vehicle provider”
You know that Satelite states werent part of USSR, right? They were a part of Warsaw pack with a party that was put in by Russia. It would be same as saying that During Vietnam war, half of Vietnam was part US
4 Likes
Only Serb players will be able to shoot it down
That’s for high/top tier that France need more light tank/IFV/support vehicle. Our best light stop at 8.3, we have room for so much more fun vehicles, mainly wheeled (we are probably among the modern country leaning the most toward “team wheels” ! :D )
2 Likes
And it should never be one. Still salty that i need to see out vehicles there. Would rather not see them at all in game.
1 Like
Italy is the best in that regard, however France is a close second.
I havent implied they are?
I think there is a meaningfull distinction between a nation providing vehicles to a tree and it being a sub-tree
im talking about the VBCI-2
And I’m talking about the AMX-10P.
Absolutely.
I was quite upset when they added the M53/59 to the USSR tree.
Arguments can obviously be made for Mi-24 and T-72M2, but not for beloved Praga
3 Likes
if we get Post Communist vehicles in the USSR tree then those from countries like Estonia who are now Nato aren’t off the table
Perhaps I misinterpreted your statement then, my bad
yeah bringing a premium IFV to an argument when a tech tree one doesnt exist, realy isnt the best argument
1 Like
That picture alone gives me Apex predator flashbacks