Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 2)

Well diversity definitely isn’t a bad thing to have.
Whether a vehicle is good or not can’t really be assessed properly until it is added, so I wouldn’t say it would either be better or worse gameplay wise, we just don’t know. What I do know is that it’s a huge waste of a critical part of the British army.
Just as practically no part of ZA is copy paste the same could be said for the domestic British stuff.

In my personal opinion it’s also a waste if what could’ve made for a cool independent tree in South Africa, but that’s more my side of viewing things.

1 Like

Well, the higher rank vehicles will consist of unique ones like BM oplot, Gripen, T-50, Stingray and more.

I especially hope that Nanchang J-12 and Vextra POLE make it as well as Vextra 105. Those vehicles I’ve been wishing for for quite a time.

1 Like

My F-15J suggestion passed hmmmm 🤨

5 Likes

I’d rather not see a tree go practically ignored and not growing over complaining about copy/paste that isn’t even a true copy.
Without a sub-tree I could only imagine Japan lasting another year at most, at that point they would have too little to really upkeep themselves.

1 Like

Yeah and S.korea cannot be a subtree to Japan due to politics, so I welcome Thai being a subtree for Japan.

3 Likes

im going to be honest the CVRT family would suck in warthunder most of them not even making past 7.7

look at the Scorpion it has no stabiliser and no thermals with a 76mm gun that can only fire hesh.

look at the Scimitar again no stabiliser and no thermals this time with a 30mm rarden one of if not the worst auto cannon on an IFV in the game

oh look a Sabre a cheaper version of the Scimitar fixing none of the issues

No, S-Korea to Japan, N-Korea to China, Thailand with ASEAN.

Average post-war british APC/IFV

Scimitar mk2 has thermals and if gaijin cares enough access to give it the prototype L21A1 Apfsds
plus the Scorpion 90, also has thermals and apfsds along with being fully stabilized…

At the very least it can serve as an indicator of where the devs attention is, and for top tier vehicles and can be a sign of where the devs might be taking to game

oh wow it might make it to 8.3 with the warrior then since it wont have a stab or ATGMS to kill tanks from the front

i just want a better warrior to compete with the BMP and Bradley

1 Like

yeah same sadly gaijin doesnt seem to care about giving us a better IFV ( I could name 3 separate warrior variants not to mention the other IFV we could get )

This is ignoring IFVs that Britain could muster, which UK would have quite capable ones.
Ajax may be terrible IRL, but in game would likely be a very powerful vehicles.

Stormer 30 when gaijin…

United korea is one of the few remaining fun looking concept tech trees. We shouldn’t waste that on a sub tree.

2 Likes

i would agree if it wasnt for the fact I know gaijin will never added it because “it is to advanced” even though we have the KF41 and 2S38

Speaking about the 2s38…

Spoiler

image

I still wondering how low and mig tier would look like. As so far when i hear Korean vehicle, all i imagine are vehicles that would go into high/top tier. If you have any pics of how the TT would look like, i would love to see it.