Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 2)

and less Aim-9.

though i’d still guess Premium IDS not ADV. We already have the Phantom F4J(UK) for premium A2A, something for ground attack would be nice, to match the Su-39. Either a premium Tornado IDS or Jaguar would be good

Though im still suspect it will be for Italy as they lack an 11.3 Premium currently

Im pretty sure you have no idea how to read honestly

It had the famous “Blue Circle” radar or what it really was, concrete


Couldn’t post the video here since the file was too big, but I came across a rather interesting leak on a WT discord server about 30-40 minutes ago
Screenshot from said video, showing wingtip AMRAAMs on the F-16C (Will remove if necessary)

Edit: not sure if I can link to possibly the full video, so I will say this: looking at the video, this was done waaaaay too well to be a fake. Shading looks right/moves properly when the camera does, the modelling and texturing for it looks perfect for WT, and finally: you can’t add user-made assets or models (such as weapons) into the hangar, even if it’s a USER-made hangar. As a matter of fact, I don’t even think you can add in CDK weapons.

There are two options for what this could be:

  1. Old footage of AMRAAM testing on internal servers (stated in a leak at least 2-3 patches ago)
  2. Possibly newer footage from an internal test server

Second edit: the usage of the F-16C in the video implies that this video was possibly taken 2 patches ago, seeing as the F-16C likely wasn’t available for use (or even finished) until Sons of Atilla first came out.

12 Likes

Someone posted it on the reddit, also. It being zoomed in slightly is suspicious for me.

1 Like

Could be from testing rather then implementation

Möglich.

1 Like

the model and textures are way off the warthunder style

PostFX and Graphics settings perhaps

Bro what is the heli in the background

" unarmoured/poorly armoured ", but not moreso than the DDG/CG 's themselves. In many cases the older ships are actually better protected against this kind of armament.

" Problem ", but is it ? Having AShM/SAM armaments onboard does extend the MM range a ship of specific size can remain relevant at, which is useful in lineups alongside larger, more conventionally-armed ships. But they are still limited by their hulls compared to the BR ranges those conventional ships can support.

Against aircraft it 's largely a non-start, the missiles allow a tradeoff to attack accurately at long ranges in place of reactivity to extreme close-in targets - like one might be presented w/ around a terrain feature. That trade still doesn’t overcome the missile-ship 's vulnerability against the main foe in NF, other surface ships, and their ability to influence the match by interacting w/ the other team 's ships or the objectives.

An Apache.

1 Like

The Apache?

No its two bladed it looks like a chinook helicopter

Video quality isn’t good, and to be fair, the screenshot I took from the video ain’t great either. It’s going to look a little off

1 Like

The only heli in the image is the Apache to the left. There is no Chinook.

_20231129_013553

Really ? The Ah64 got a square cockpit this is round

I don’t know what to tell you. If you can’t tell that’s an Apache, that’s an issue, not an issme.

5 Likes

Yes, that is a 144p Apache

1 Like

Ah yea mb I’m looking at this on my phone and its like almost 2am