you also have 5 separated bomb drops and you dont have to sacrifice a gun pod for them
You forgot that you also need to take a gun pod on 10.3 one if you want to fight other air. on 11.0 one you can bring 2x aim-9J so you aer little bit better. But compare to other CAS around those BR, i would say they are dead last.
105G can drop them separately unlike A32A, no? I’ve never played it on my acc so idk
That thing was 6.7 at release, or are you conveniently leaving that out for your argument?
1 Like
Okay. SO if they should get anything. Let remove whole top tier becuase why should other get anythign. Why sould russia get new Mig and T-80s/T-72. Why should US get new Abrams, F-16s, F-14s, F-111. Israel Merkavas. Germany Mig-29 and Leopard. Remove them all
Swedes when they don’t get literally every single MBT in the universe in 1 update (now they are left to suffer):
2 Likes
Germany isn’t any more of a major nation than sweden when it comes to ground.
1 Like
the a32a can drop them separately as well
1 Like
Do you know what else was at 6.7? A Pt-76-57. Mate. Like i said. It was stupid there, and it isnt a first vehicle that Gaijin release in low BR. Hell a fucking CV9040B was at 8.3 i think when it was added into the game. Su-25s were at 9.3.
I expect them to add “possible” “in-development” radars for high-end Russian jets. For example MiG-35 with AESA. Idk about other possibilities so I’ll just leave it on that
Then dont cry to me here about it. Go to Gaijin. Make suggestion for better armored Leopards. I cant do anything about it.
I mean even in air they are (almost) always 1 patch behind
I have to try it out then
Yeah, if you build your payload correctly you will have 2x 500lbs bomb and 3x 1000 lbs bombs with 1 gun pod. Building pay load on A32A is pain as you have such a small carry weight.
Why would I make a suggestion about it now? We are close to a new Leopard anyway.
I’ll just always call out swedish BS mentality that they somehow weren’t hand held for ground.
Many tanks should have more robust mantlet/breeches, but they do not, this is for balance purposes. Otherwise T-90A,S, and the soon to come M, just as examples, should be almost immune to threats at their BR’s.
The ERA in question is marketed as Armor Shield R. It’s the same stuff Rafael puts on the IDF’s Zeldas. It’s meant almost entirely for chemical protection, and gives marginal protection up to 30mm KE threats. The 84mm’s of extra protection I’ve seen thrown around is much larger than zero, but 84mm is still not that significant vs threats at that tier.
All ERA code is the same. Nothing is independently modelled. If they give the ERA some KE protection, they’re going to have to set some arbitrary “anti-KEP” effect from 0-100 to emulate the missing 84mm’s of KE. They need to find a way to rebuild ERA and KEP’s.
The rest of your complaints are totally understandable, and I think generally everyone supports.
1 Like
What hand held. Yes, they had a better armored Leopard 2A5s, but if i remember correctly for 2 years their top tier round was a DM33…which Germany use at 9.0/9.3 (then 8.7)
you can use 2 500kg and 3 250kg, while the 250kg are close an equivalent to the 1000lbs, i most of the time just use the 5 250s or 4 250s and one 600kg. and also have tracers and much more ammo for the guns
Since when does Germany use 120mm DM33 at 9.3?
Seriously brother you should probably take a look at trees that aren’t sweden sometimes. It would do you good.
1 Like
That’s hilarious when you compare the trees…
1 Like