Many tanks should have more robust mantlet/breeches, but they do not, this is for balance purposes. Otherwise T-90A,S, and the soon to come M, just as examples, should be almost immune to threats at their BR’s.
The ERA in question is marketed as Armor Shield R. It’s the same stuff Rafael puts on the IDF’s Zeldas. It’s meant almost entirely for chemical protection, and gives marginal protection up to 30mm KE threats. The 84mm’s of extra protection I’ve seen thrown around is much larger than zero, but 84mm is still not that significant vs threats at that tier.
All ERA code is the same. Nothing is independently modelled. If they give the ERA some KE protection, they’re going to have to set some arbitrary “anti-KEP” effect from 0-100 to emulate the missing 84mm’s of KE. They need to find a way to rebuild ERA and KEP’s.
The rest of your complaints are totally understandable, and I think generally everyone supports.
What hand held. Yes, they had a better armored Leopard 2A5s, but if i remember correctly for 2 years their top tier round was a DM33…which Germany use at 9.0/9.3 (then 8.7)
you can use 2 500kg and 3 250kg, while the 250kg are close an equivalent to the 1000lbs, i most of the time just use the 5 250s or 4 250s and one 600kg. and also have tracers and much more ammo for the guns
Yeah, it can. I would even be fine if you would have researchable mod on 2A5 where you can add it, but Gaijin decided no. And im sorry, that Swedish military didn’t use anything else.
Sure…i wouldnt mind seeing that also. But once again, they need to make a suggestion for that. And not yell at me that Germany got a Leopards version that Gaijin gave then and Sweden getting the only version of Leopard 2A5 that they used.
Spoilt? My best CAS is a fucking SAAB-105G. Italy doesnt have anythign good for CAS and i still didnt got the Tornado and AV-8B+ Those are pretty much only 2 airs i play.