I actually don’t think they’ll do that for once. The BR system allows for vehicles to be balanced either way. Russia would likely just end up getting worse radar, but on better airframes for the BR.
I’m rarely very optimistic, but here I think it’s very hard to do wrong. The F-2 is a very well known aircraft for being the first AESA equipped service fighter and that makes it near impossible to mess up. So unless they deliberately hate Japan, which as much as it’s joled about I doubt, they will add the F-2 first.
Yeah I enjoy 105G much more. It’s silly how much bomb load it can carry. I usually run it with x2 1000lb, x2 gun pods, x2 250lb. It’s hella fun even at 9.7
You forgot that you also need to take a gun pod on 10.3 one if you want to fight other air. on 11.0 one you can bring 2x aim-9J so you aer little bit better. But compare to other CAS around those BR, i would say they are dead last.
Okay. SO if they should get anything. Let remove whole top tier becuase why should other get anythign. Why sould russia get new Mig and T-80s/T-72. Why should US get new Abrams, F-16s, F-14s, F-111. Israel Merkavas. Germany Mig-29 and Leopard. Remove them all
Do you know what else was at 6.7? A Pt-76-57. Mate. Like i said. It was stupid there, and it isnt a first vehicle that Gaijin release in low BR. Hell a fucking CV9040B was at 8.3 i think when it was added into the game. Su-25s were at 9.3.
I expect them to add “possible” “in-development” radars for high-end Russian jets. For example MiG-35 with AESA. Idk about other possibilities so I’ll just leave it on that
Yeah, if you build your payload correctly you will have 2x 500lbs bomb and 3x 1000 lbs bombs with 1 gun pod. Building pay load on A32A is pain as you have such a small carry weight.
Many tanks should have more robust mantlet/breeches, but they do not, this is for balance purposes. Otherwise T-90A,S, and the soon to come M, just as examples, should be almost immune to threats at their BR’s.
The ERA in question is marketed as Armor Shield R. It’s the same stuff Rafael puts on the IDF’s Zeldas. It’s meant almost entirely for chemical protection, and gives marginal protection up to 30mm KE threats. The 84mm’s of extra protection I’ve seen thrown around is much larger than zero, but 84mm is still not that significant vs threats at that tier.
All ERA code is the same. Nothing is independently modelled. If they give the ERA some KE protection, they’re going to have to set some arbitrary “anti-KEP” effect from 0-100 to emulate the missing 84mm’s of KE. They need to find a way to rebuild ERA and KEP’s.
The rest of your complaints are totally understandable, and I think generally everyone supports.
What hand held. Yes, they had a better armored Leopard 2A5s, but if i remember correctly for 2 years their top tier round was a DM33…which Germany use at 9.0/9.3 (then 8.7)
you can use 2 500kg and 3 250kg, while the 250kg are close an equivalent to the 1000lbs, i most of the time just use the 5 250s or 4 250s and one 600kg. and also have tracers and much more ammo for the guns