Vanguard class, HMS Vigilant(S30)
4 Likes
To my knowledge all 3 are being actively used in combat.
Hoping that with that recent suggestion passed for re-running old events, we’ll see the ability to earn old decals that you no longer can obtain. Honestly what is the point in having them in the game, unobtainable unless you were there when it released?
4 Likes
Especially with how few decals are available to minor nations - They could really do with the content
Are those ICBM/Ballistic missile in the mid section?
Yes.
3 Likes
i dont know how you people think a better round is somehow gonna negate “game breaking” era
maaYbe if it stops all other apfsds (like you cope) then what exactly changes for newer rounds
subtree or full on tree? because one is c&p and the other a good addition
just because you cant see green behind the era doesnt mean its there… like cmon how many times do you see green era in protection analysis?
Newer APFSDS is meant to counter ERA like Relikt. It’s almost as if engineering is capable of continuing the Armor-Weapon development cycle.
Otherwise if you want to treated like an idiot you’re more then welcome to keep going with gaslighting.
again, if its “gamebreaking” what changes
Newer APFSDS have a head that separates to detonate ERA, then the rest of the rod is able to go through.
Combine that with ERA tweaks and it becomes an actually playable experience.
the DM53 already has ERA breaking capabilities, just wasnt added into the game
1 Like
yea youre talking irl im talking in game
and i dont know what game youre playing but the one i am doesnt simulate apfsds distabilisation
I completely forgot DM53 was segmented, which it should still be implemented to solve half the problems with ERA.
Which on top volumetric tweaking should be added. The add on ERA causes to many problems and we don’t need more of it.
What are you even talking about at this point? You’re focusing on one point that I’m talking about just to argue.
Photoshop, the article is also fake
2 Likes
the information available on the DM73 is an advertisement paper claming it’s for 20% higher penetration power than the previous Dart
aren’t those old files from silent thunder ?
I don’t see those types of subs coming any time soon. What would be the use for 16 ICBM anyway ? X)
Naval nuke lol