Next Major Update - "Eagle's Shadow" Rumour Roundup & Discussion (Part 2)

I mean depends how you do it, if you were using regular bombs then yeah if you were doing close pop up attack with ARMs then ehh

from what I have seen the clusters are good vs anything that isnt just a straight MBT

2 Likes

I think poland would be a very nice nation, 7tp could be the reserve, M4s and T34s than T54s, and Top Tier is the Highlight: K2, The T72 versions(Twardy, Goryl and so on), Leos and Abrums… God now I want poland In game

2 Likes

but not a lot of options in air

I focused on tanks so I didnt noticed. But if than make it China 2.0 or like isarel give it some subtrees (Russia :P)

Yeah our air wouldn’t be as good as our ground tree, helicopter would be pretty good though

3 Likes

But tbh this could evolve to sort of a meta nation in GRB Top Tier

1 Like

So far the dev server is as disappointing as the previous update’s one in the sense of vehicle configuration.

HMS Danae is implemented in her 5 6-inch and 2 4-inch cannon configuration, however the 4 inch guns are not linked with the main cannons, so you cannot control them at the same time. So why not implement it in her the very before 1943 refit, it would also have adequate AA?

Also the Su-15TM lacks R-60Ms, lacks dual R-60 pylons, lacks countermeasures. Having the vehicle at rank VII, 10.7 would be better as right now it blocks the place of a Su-9 or an early Su-15.

Gaijin should give the Yak 130 CM pod and R73 using dynamic BR and move it up in BR.

Hear me out Snail, how about a Leopard 2A6MA3 as Squadron Vehicle for Germany?

It feels like the Last Squadron Vehicle for Germany was Added like 5 Years ago…

Edit:
Me 262: Update 1.91 Night Vision (2019)
Hunter F.58: Update 2.25 “Sky Guardians”(2023)
Leopard 2PL: Update 2.5 “Ixwa Strike” (2021)
Karl Marx: Update 2.15 “Wind of Change” (2022)

2 Likes

i wonder if poland and yugoslavia will work

Dutch leased version for France too.

1 Like

I thought the French Community doesnt want more Leos in there Tree?

drag coefficient has nothing to do with the size of a plane and is independent from it
you can have a small 10cm^3 cube with a worse drag coefficient than a sphere with a radius of 100cm
but at the end the sphere will still have more drag
image

at the same time if you change the size of the cube the drag coefficient wont change at all, because its shape didnt change
the aera of an object/ plane is a separate value in the formula to calculate drag

The Drag Equation

There’s not really much of a link between the two iirc barring Poland selling T-55s to Yugoslavia. I do suppose it would help quite a bit though.

Czechoslovakia has a good enough link due to extensive cooperation and have quite a nice array of aircraft including interwar originals, locally made (and supposedly upgraded) Me 262s and if course the Albatross family.

1 Like

my point is about top tier air.

poland cant just be with a f-16 and a f-35 while other tree have 4 or more top tier air

Edit; mistakenly read it as total drag instead of drag coefficient

“For a plane it’s size” , i.e. compared to other planes of the same size.

should have been TT at the place of the current copypasted 2a6nl that brings nothing but RP waste, atleast it would have given something unique dutch styled

that is still not how the drag coefficent works

which is what i tried explaining

the Cd dosent care about the size of an object

you could make the J-10 twice as big and the Cd would still be the same

1 Like

as a person that studied physics for work for many years, thank you, that’s pleasant to see someone speaking actual physics properly XD

Oh, yeah. I read and understood it as total drag. My bad.