Actually, while you’re here is there any news/clarification on this beauty of a change
1 Like
I’m not. Between my 5th coffee of the day, the recent… discussions, I’m having a ball
1 Like
So weird every time the community is heated the forums just “glitch”, am I right?
1 Like
Not spamming, but just a reminder that the devs themselves even mentioned considering putting Singaporean vehicles in Israel (or wherever that was needed), the IA problem could’ve been avoided entirely with F-15SG as the option, just saying.
5 Likes
sorry we have too many breathing copernicium
Its a bug and will be corrected. Naturally the C does not have an AESA.
3 Likes
And they did add one (in ground). They however, never mentioned that the 15SG would be added.
😥 year ruined
1 Like
If the A is getting RB99s then is it intended that the C is just an air to ground upgrade then going forwards?
That was my first thought as well. Damn that skin is ugly.
1 Like
hi I already made a thread in Dev section but it seems no one has replied so I’ll be reposting it here
Ever since the dev server opened it seems that systems with IME enabled is blocked from using fullscreen
What is the reason behind this?
It’s not that “far above” the other modern jets.
I tried doing a bug report and suggestion to get it changed to something more realistic but both are AWOL
1 Like
For sure. Worst part is I know how much effort that texture probably took too 😢
1 Like
Hi smin with the MiG-29KR having gone up in BR in ground battles to 13.3 have devs been reconsidering the decision to not give it the Kh-31PD/AD?
since now its 13.3, and for comparison the Su-27SM at 13.3 gets access to the Kh-31PD/AD
1 Like
Would Gaijin ever consider only adding fake vehicles to the arcade mode and leaving real vehicles for realistic/sim? I think that would be a cool addition
@Smin1080p_WT So the answer about one of the Image where it Identifies a Target and Detects it with an Outline is not the Priority in that Report here.
This Image right here is about Locking and Tracking Via a Hotspot (I.e A IRST)
And the Fact that only 1 picture out of several and the Information about the ATTICA and the WAO (Weapon Station Optronic) being able to use the same Viewing Channel as the Commander Sight is Questionable as That Exact Same Thing Can Be seen on the PUMA IFV for example is simply incorrect from the response and the Fact that It has been said that The Optics have nothing to do with the Leopard 2A8 Despite Hensoldt Advertising the PERI RTWL Digital HD For the Leopard 2A8, Puma and Schakal IFV.
Now i dont want to Argue but I can see a fault in the Response.
Again, I know. That doesn’t mean Gaijin didn’t have the options for it either. It is what I’ve been saying this whole time. They’ve HAD options for it!
You even acknowledged it was and posted the same thing earlier.
Its very clear you personally want this aircraft. But as we mentioned, it was never in our plans. Spamming about it sadly isnt going to change that.
I mean We also have VL-MICA and Sweden already paid for the SLM so we don’t have to have our version of the SLM
1 Like