there amazing except when you bite them wrong and the corners stab your mouth
Reported the DSU-33s being present on JDAMs incorrectly, doubt we’ll get it for this major but there’s a chance given the requisite stuff to fix it already exists.
JDAMs erroneously have DSU-33 proximity sensor // Gaijin.net // Issues
2 Likes
Hmmmm… why was the update a whole GB? I can’t see any differences beyond whatever 3 or 4 plane things you are talking about!
The best looking US fifth gen is the X-32 and I am willing to die on that hill
Please seek your nearest medical professional.
2 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT How come that a source for a different version of a vehicle is allowed to be used to nerf 2A7V gun depression but a video from the Bundeswehr itself, which literally specifies 2A7V some 20-50s prior to stating -9° to +20° elevation angles “do not specify modification of the tank”?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1diFn2GEpBPN
What does it say? Right, 2A7V…
Edit: The official X/Twitter page also confirms this.
Just as absurd as throwing aside the tankograd books, one of which being written by the literal procurement manager for the Bundeswehr’s Leopard 2; Frank Lobitz.
I compared the datasheet from the 2A7NO brochure (yes it’s for 2A7NO, see below) with the official bundeswehr specifications for 2A7V
In what universe do you guys think anyone is stupid enough to consider this as a primary source for Leopard 2A7V, when it doesnt even show Leopard 2A7V, nor lists specifications related to it, nor names it?
You can also literally verify in minutes that this brochure is for 2A7NO, not 2A7V; A DIFFERENT MODIFICATION OF A VEHICLE, by looking at the metadata:
“Executive Summary Brochure Norway”
And yes, it says 2A8, but guess what? It’s a 1:1 copy paste:
And now, take a wild guess where all the values from the “2A7” brochure are from?
right, 2A7NO
And how much of a primary source can this even be, when BRMs constantly state “oh it’s a different modification of a vehicle” for any other value in it?
Not a singular source for Leopard 2A7V was used to make this change and yet all sources specific to Leopard 2A7V are disregarded in favour of it.
How hypocritical can you even be?
25 Likes
The worst thing ever said on these forums
2 Likes
Aside from “Poland should be a sub tree to Germany”
My medical professional told me not to lie about this, so I will have to remain on that hill
1 Like
yas queen live your truth
No, because that is just different radar modes operating simultaneously.
If the value of a new radar is unknown, they use the value of the previous radar as substitute. It’s done for everyone pretty much.
1 Like
You forgot the fingernail emoticon 💅
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
3 Likes
They won’t care.
They will cling to the ONE wrong source they have not to have to revert the nerf like the fate of the universe depends on it.
3 Likes
We really are clutching a little here the Captor AESA is not that much better and it should be buffed as it is not operating as it should in the real world.
The one source they have is their correspondent that they trust a little bit too much.
This isn’t anything new lol
1 Like
or it will just be “forwarded as a suggestion” for the next 3 years
1 Like
is it… you know… him?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
i suppose the plaque in the norwegian army video is the same (copy paste from a old one/using outdated data)?