Does look like they have clam:
1 Like
I read that as “Selfish” at first of over it being a sea life tread deal. but that is not a claim.
Oh… I said Clam(as in living thing) over Claim. That’s a good one. thanks for the laugh.
1 Like
The only SPAAs that I can think of to add to the US tree are the T249 Vigilante or the MIM-46 Mauler, neither of which would stand well at Pantsir tier.
The Multi-Mission Effects Vehicle is a Canadian-only project. The US has no part in it.
Neither does the UK, therefore, the vehicle goes to the country which has more ties to it - considering the ADATS missile system IS BUILT by the US (and Switzerland, Oerlikon and Martin Marietta), and the optics are literally ripped right of the Apache, it very much is built by the US, at least partially.
Like I already said, the US is the only user of the LAV 3 chassis via the Stryker, therefore adding yet another point why it should be in the US tree.
Just because it’s Canadian, doesn’t mean it should go to the UK. There is nothing that binds Canada to the UK, not in real life, not in-game. It makes far more sense for the MMEV to be in the US tree. I’m guessing you’ll be pulling the Commonwealth argument, if it can even be called one, with how bad the argumentation around it usually ends up.
Either way, it shouldn’t be in the game as none of these countries need it.
1 Like
That’s no reason to take our LAVs unless you hate Canada and don’t want them to use their tech together.
Nope. The only other Nation out of the there involved was the Swiss as it was their Canadian branch to build it.
How about the same Monarch, The Government system is the same, The military is structured the same(and uses Royal in everything. Simply put Canada has more in common with the UK than the US.
Debatable in gameplay but yeah basically. The USAF (and NATO in general) relies heavily on air dominance as a doctrine and so don’t often have a need for SHORAD like the Soviets, later Russians, did. There’s a reason the NATO AA is all either long range or basically point blank, and it’s because the CAP fighters were expected to do the rest.
But this can’t work in the game in its current state, and likely will never work, due to how spawn points and the game style in general for tank battles works. Not to mention helicopters being very much able to kill a jet before said jet gets close enough to the helicopter, through the use of oddly-guided ATGMs that in reality would likely struggle to even get close enough to a fast jet to do any real damage.
2 Likes
on god.
1 Like
You must be Québécois. lol.
1 Like
If you want to use that card Canada was Independent in 1931. 8 years before WW2.
The “Statute of Westminster” made all nations who signed equal to the UK in the empire.
Your argument is that the US uses a vehicle based on the LAV-III so it’s as bad as the one you claim mine are. It’s Canadian without any US involvement whatsoever, the US even rejected the ADATS system. Your agreements you use mean the Ram II shouldn’t be in your tree.
But hey what do I a Canadian know about my own country and where its stuff should go?
You all know what here is an argument you all can’t reject. The Multi-Mission Effects Vehicle was to replace the ADATS vehicles in Canadian service so it should go where the Canadian ADATS is the vehicle it was to replace.
So it should go to the UK which has the vehicle it was built as a replacement for.
Mauler can be added after the Chaparral and the vigilante can be placed after the M163
The AN/TWQ-1 Avenger could be added all though not at top tier. It could use multiple load outs with either 8 Stingers or 4 Stingers and a .50 cal
I doubt the Patriot will ever be added just based on how it functions. That is what the US uses for AA Defense.
Pretty sure it can carry 8 stingers and a .50 cal. The 50 doesn’t eliminate a pod it’s just mounted under.
3 Likes
The Avenger always carries the .50 cal with 8x Stingers:
4 Likes
Being able to kill helis at all past 2km is a massive boon alone
1 Like
Had me in the first half king
Facts. What BR is the VT1 right now?
11.7rb
1 Like