i will repeat what Ive said in the other thread - issues stemming from gaijins spaghetti code and the randomness factor it brings into game should ultimately have no bearing on balance discussion as they are in their nature random and cannot be replicated.
What I think you are underestimating is the accuracy with which these FPV drones would be able to strike their targets, compared with their relative “tactical mobility”, allowing them to attack at parts of vehicles that arent that protected (coincidentally its the same IRL issue we are witnessing at place that shouldnt be named).
Switchblade 300 is:
Powerful enough to take out IRIS-T SLM TADS vehicle
Powerful enough to take out ADATs
Powerful enough to detonate Leopard 2 ready rack.
Powerful enough to deonate Abrams ready rack.
Wiki says its warhead is like that of a Javelin. Since we dont have that one in game, Im assuming penetration at least on par with TOW and Shillelagh.
On top of all the aforementioned vehicles, Switchblade 600 is:
Powerfull enough to take out BVM
Powerfull enough to ammorack Leclerc
Powerfull enough to take out Oplot
Are you starting to see the problem?
Since we dont have EW, what exactly would prevent me from spawning a Switchblade 300, fly out of bounds of ground map nap of the earth towards enemy spawn, and just dome some poor fella in AA? What counterplay does he have to defend himself? Have another player in gun based AA/IFV with airtracking and proxy babysit him? Popsmoke which doesnt interfere with my controls, allowing me to just hit him anyway? Shoot his missile at me? Just yesterday Ive tested CAMM and that missile couldnt hit me circling him in Eurofighter at near stall speeds at 2km distance/500m alt. Switchblade 300 flying below multipath alt would be uncounterable for top tier AA that doesnt have guns.
Sure does sound like funny gameplay loop, further disincentivizing players from spawning top tier AA because their million dollar machine is helpless against 400$ temu drone with grenade.
Unless of course all of this is desired outcome for you, in which case I have nothing further to say to you.