I think hes mixing them up.
id rather take a Sunderland than a tornado
I forgot the F-104 exists. Yeah its probably worse, at least for now with placeholder FM on the nado being half decent in sustained fights
1 Like
I’d be wary of falling into that trap. One could not score a single kill all game yet prove invaluable for the team. Equally, you could have the reverse, where a Player makes lots and lots of bad plays but since they happen to be right place right time, or get a lucky guns kill etc., they could have the most godly K/D.
Like me in my stock Spit Mk14. 9 Kills because I was extremely lucky, and an enemy was so generous he thought he’d die to me twice as opposed to once.
You say that, a Sunderland can actually be very funny as a rate fighter. Not to mention the defensive and offensive firepower you can deploy.
I play F-15A and MiG-29G after Iraninan F-14A comes but, don’t have any issues for dodging FK90s.
Rather, I find the F-14As facing at WVR horrifying because it has lighter airframe from B model and, MiG-29s has awful fight models rn.
They also have no power so just slowly go on a vertical spiral and you’ll beat them easily.
My Spitfire mk24 stats are all from CAS in GRB, its an absolute monster at 6.7-7.0 until an SU9 turns up to ruin the game for everyone.
Meanwhile my Wyvern stats are all from ai targets in ARB, on the card it looks like my wyvern has a better PVP K/D because ai is counted in the same stat numbers.
And yeah assists are completely forgotten when id say they are more important than a straight out kill, as it means someone was playing with a significantly less capable vehicle for a time instead of a fresh new tank or plane
1 Like
Mostly the same weapons planned for the Su-57 on the Su-47 as the Su-47 prototyped the Su-57’s weapons bays, on the Mig 1.44 though english sources just point towards it having late Flanker weapons on an actually capable platform with better defensive aids.
That’s what I basically do but, third party kills are really annoying honestly :/
By playerbase opinion brother
Yeah I should airfield camp and J out every tme someone sends a missle to have 100% contrlol
He is one of the US mains who never wants his vehicles balanced
Huh?
Even then
History repeats it self. Use the av8b if you have it and farm f14s. It’s like the gr7 vs hordes of f14s again
the Iranian f14 having R27Rs in its complement makes it perfect for the merge. Missile isn’t the fastest but it’s harder to dodge so you’ll clap tf out of people who would otherwise dodge an AIM 7S/M.
Hahaha!!! Good one man. So I was right, you want Gaijin to balance this game by gut feeling.
If they were to only balance vehicles listening to the opinions of this playerbase we’d have Tiger 2 tanks at 4.7 fighting 75mm shermans.
The absolute worst idea I’ve seen in a minute. All video game compagnies use their internal metrics to balance their multiplayer games, Gaijin is no exception, deal with it. WT wouldn’t have lasted 2 years with your idea.
I’ve never seen anyone ask for anything like that before.
I think that Gaijin should take player opinion into account, like they currently do. Gaijin also needs to rely less on “efficiency” and more on comparisons and vehicle stats. The players are better than Gaijin than balancing, since no sane person would put the Char25T at the same BR as the object 906.
Let me rephrase, they should take players opinions on the direction of the game i.e. new game modes, smaller lobbies, new maps, new types of vehicles, weapons, etc. They should not let something as important as game balance in the hands of a vocal majority however.
I’ve never seen anyone ask for anything like that before.
Where do you think the “Germany suffers” meme came from?
If they were to listen to players this is what would happen (asking to keep the PTL02/WMA301 at 8.3) - look at the upvotes. Yeah no thanks.
