Nothing is more dangerous than a fool convinced of his own wisdom.
Said the man thinking presumption of innocence = burden of proof.
Ironic coming from you.
1 Like
Nothing ironic in it tho. You are so convicted that you are just too blind to see.
At least i dont equal presumption of innocence with burden of proof 💀
1 Like
Again, stop using terms you do not understand.
Like a broken record.
1 Like
Soo whats your opinion on the Aim120Bs? should they be nerfed?
(getting back on topic)
1 Like
Eh, i think ive read it in one of the earlier comments, Movrans i think.
AMRAAMs have range, but thats it. Under certain distance, R-77 and MICAs outperform them si theyre ok imo.
MICAs especially. I have yet to figure out what to do if its sub 10km launch and im not hugging the ground already.
Do you know you can be locked in PD and TWS even flying like that?
says the guy who keep saying the same and same thing without any proof to back up his baseless claims.
You are so resistant to knowledge that it ain’t even funny
Video isn’t really all that useful. There is another YouTuber “MiGan Fox-3 “ he explains it in the absolute most simplest way possible while also showing how it plays out in gameplay and sensor vision replays in air RB. I’ve personally gotten way better once I understood from him
In court of law the plaintiff is carrying the burden of proof, so if you transfer that onto that thread, OP of that thread is actually in need to provide evidence for his claims.
Even after 3500 posts he nor anyone else did that.
1 Like
While yes, i shoudlve written it correctly, it doesnt change a fact that you cant prove a negative.
1 Like
Then that thread should be deleted because nothing of value will arise from it.
The plaintiff has had himself cornered in from the start and the case would tumble by the end of the opening statement.
People unlawfully transferring the burden of proof onto someone else and then thinking they’ve accomplished something is a prime example of how an average forumite is like 13 years old.
1 Like
Typhoon and Rafale are Gen 4.5?
As far as I know for all these missiles, theyre all about the same, the thrust vectoring is easy enough to beat you just have to make the platform who is slinging them slow enough the missile spins out.
the aim120bs i think are considered the best due to versatility over the others.
Like its still a good close range missile, wont pull anything stupid like a 90 degree turn at 1.5km but itll get the job done.
1 Like
I think it’s still the best long range ARH while definitely being usable in mid ranges. It suffers in close range but hey, you don’t need to be perfect in every scenario.
1 Like
Biggest issues I had/have with 120s on Typhoon is if you are flying too fast they cannot pull enough G to hit the target ha ha
I have since slowed down and 120s are perfectly serviceable.
1 Like
Aye that was kinda what i mean, it wont pull off the rails like an r77 or mica but itll certainly do alright
All the ARH missiles are quite power thoigh so
1 Like
Yet to get the typhoom 😂