DUDE I ALWAYS FLIGHT AT 30-40m!
Then that is very long
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Again…
R-77 has the exact same seeker at the moment. They are 100% equal in terms of their ability to resist chaff/be notched, how they are affected by MP and how well they track a target.
AMRAAM is better at long range, but actually weaker at short range.
The far more likely thing you are experiencing is a difference in FM and radar performance. Su-27 has one of the weakest top tier radars at the moment and aircraft like the F-15 and Typhoon climb exceptionally well and love high alt and so even if they had the exact same ARH as the Su-27, would enjoy quite an advantage over the Su-27 in terms of range just through launch conditions.
Stock grinds suck in everything, especially if you also dont get IRCCM stock (like the F3 for example) even if you get AMRAAM.
There is nothing to nerf on the Aim-120 because its not overperforming. In fact its underperforming.
Yes there is a compression issue at top tier, but Su-27SM would still more than likely only be 1-2 BR stops away from the current 14.0s and even if there was a LOT of decompression and you’d still face AMRAAM slingers from the FA2/AV-8B+ to the ICE and F3 and up to things like the Gripen C.
Also dont neglect your R-27ER/T. They are incredibly potent still.
so 100km radar detection at 13.7, +220m/s rate of ascension and 10 Fox-3s means its a “bad radar”?
dude, i got no issue locking enemies at +70km with the Su-27, so the Su-27SM should be better in almost everything, and the RWR is a lot better than the one in the older Flanker, so i can detect planes and missiles at the same time, making my life a lot more ez when trying to find enemies at my surroundings
Compared to PESA radars like the SU-34 and SU-30 or full AESA like in the Rafale or even Kfir C10. yes
Its also much weaker than Foxhunter (F3), Blue Vixen (FA2 and Gripen) and should be a LOT weaker than CAPTOR-M (Typhoon) but unfortunately isnt due to the buggy nature of CAPTOR-M
Su-27SM is considered the second weakest radar, just ahead of the J-11As which has a single DL channel but is largely the same otherwise.
1 Like
PD: in ur opinion, i should carry 4 R-77, 2 R-27ER, 2 R-27ET and 4 R-73? or 6 R-77, 2 R-27ET and 4 R-73?
Increasing the seeker range would be a nerf imo
Because the target has more time to react to the active missile
I have no idea. You’ll have to decide which missile you would use the most. Id probably run quite a few R-27ETs though because unless the target has MAWS, they rarely see them coming
not really, i got a few kills with R-27ER at +40km, so if u keep the lock at least when the Fox-3 locks by its own, u could get an easy kill
Some situations it could be more helpful. As it means you can start defending sooner without the need to support the shot for as long. So its not really a buff or a nerf. But still a report that should have been actioned a while ago
plus, its wrong if i have fun in toptier while getting gangbanged by SPAMRAAM?
they don’t know how far the Er is away by looking on the RWR, you can’t judge how much energy it has by looking how fast it is approaching
Meanwhile fox-3s are getting shown on the RWR separately and you can judge how much energy it has by looking at, how fast it approaches you
But what do you want them to do?
Artificially limit every single ARH Missile to have the exact same speed, max range, max G pull and seeker?
Gen 4.5s will dominate
That would be boring af
It is like giving every nation a leopard 2
Yup, but that is what it sounds like OP wants.
if everyone has the same weapons, its more a skill issue battle than a fire and forget battle/point and click battle
and i like skill issue battle