The first shot didn’t hit the track, what’s your excuse about that
Again, never happens with a NATO MBT
The first shot didn’t hit the track, what’s your excuse about that
Again, never happens with a NATO MBT
Of course
It’s just russian vehicles that are buffed like crazy
All your comments about volumetric and game mechanics don’t prove anything until you show us that those mechanic and volumetric roles apply to all nations and not only Russia.
There is a clear tendency to make Russian top tier tanks invincible and majority of War Thunder players are living with it on a daily basis and you repeating (skill issues) will not change anything. funny that when shooting at the tanks of any other nation no one is suffering from “Skill Issues”
I like it when someone counter my opinion with evidence, that’s how I am convinced.
So now honestly from your experience, you think all nations tank models are modeled correctly and its players incorrect aiming is the cause of this bias feeling ??
if so, do you also think the BMPT is also modeled correctly, because I don’t believe it is this strong on real life.
(these are genuine questions and not trying to challenge you because you proved your point of view with the videos you provided)
3 year old clip btw
No, not all tanks are modelled correctly. Gaijin loves to be incredibly inconsistent with how they model things (F-18 suffering from no channel loss for some reason as an example).
But a large reason why people believe in Russian bias is they mainly play western nations and begin only notice Russian things being either “op” or “incorrectly modelled” and grow blind to the same things occurring in other nations (35mm API-T, PUMA on release, my video of NATO volumetric bs).
Humans are inherently biased towards certain things and war thunder players are exceptionally good at denying the fact they just might suck, which results in things like Russian bias becoming popular.
As for the BMPT, I have no idea how exactly it should be IRL. That’s something I’m not an expert in, HOWEVER I do believe that its survivability is a little overperforming, specifically in regards to the external ammo belt. In my opinion it should either break a lot of components when damaged, such as barrel, breech, FCS etc or not be an external belt at all and be modelled as an internal one.
That would heavily decrease its survivability and make it less of a problem in hull down positions. I believe this would be much better than just moving it up in br, over and over again.
A large part in what makes the BMPT so strong as well is people being frustrated fighting it, they will often just whiff due to panic or something similiar and then leave the match soon after. This results in Russia just winning by default because their players aren’t 1 death leaving. So they just win through numbers rather than anything else
so…?
Holy skill issue clip.
Hmmm I whiffed my shot and it didn’t pen, what now? Shooting almost the exact same spot will surely won’t end the exact same way.

I think this is best left here for everyone:
I asked some looneys about russian gun shield/breech and russian carousel/autoloader…They shut their asses up
At least I didn’t bring up the ERAs model since it is a terminal cancer problem.
Thats just ginormous cope. Nato does absolutely recieve vehicles that are blatantly under BRed but you can save your "s because incorrectly modeled aka blatant selective realism is the entire reason why russia is competetive in the first place and thats whats annoying people.
Nato vehicle uncompetetive = You fucking donkey
russian vehicle uncompetetive = Oh dear gorgeous, here have some made up missiles or made up quantity of missiles or fantasy ammo belts or quantum tunneling LDIRCMs or literally anything
As long as the russian meatriders over at gaijin think 10.3 vehicles vs terminator spam is a fair match i dont really see it being fixed
🤨

Don’t forget best props for ARB meta, yakolevs, which also comes with the best WW2 CAS, Yak-9K
they’ll give the BMPT APDSFS rounds to “compensate” the BR increase
Or they’ll turn off the ability to ammo rack it entirely
it wouldn’t be nearly as ridiculous if all of its sliders weren’t maxed out and the turret wasn’t a void of no mechanical controls
This is just false. One plane doesn’t undo 4 ranks of US and British CAS dominance in bomb load alone let alone guns
Internal fuel is labled as external , external ammo belt is labeled internal , feed mechanism which is only there to make sure the ammo feeds alright is protecting the ammo from cookoff structural steel is eating the spall instead of producing it . And the best part is when they are finally killed they can respawn in the best cas vehicles with fire and forget munition while you get a q-5 late with 2 lgbs or some pitiful overtiered f-4 phantom