Number 3 “Electric engine” its literally there modelled cope as many you can it’s there nothing is going to change it.
That is actual response you completley incompetent you don’t know what is MBT and Light vehicle in the game is. No MBT in game has battery pack.
Apparently, you can’t read because I said 1, 4 and 5, not 3. So again, what and where is 1, 4 and 5 modeled at seeing how it’s part of the electrical system for said motor.
You mean the M1 Abrams and Leopard 1/2 that literally have systems that take down the turret drive if hit?
Except they do? Now, why would a rusmain lie )))
Because it’s not realized in other MBTs there is no Power system in other ones you literally digging your own grave by demanding these modules to be added to MBTs.
Except they’ve already got them, or are in the process of getting them.
Not Russia tho )))
But now, why would you defend Russia, lets see… oh, 90% of vehicles are Russian, who would’ve thought )))))))
“Only manual traverse” hmmmm nothing about electric engine.
Where is the electic part that will turn off everything ? Yeah right nowhere.
Ah the ad hominum cope harder.
so you dont need to destroy it :3
xD lmao logic
Yeah, I agree that they have the manual traverse modeled. Where’s the electrical generation system that pulls from the battery FOR the electrical motor? Ya know, parts 1, 4 and 5.
Legitimate question, are you blind or just very bad at trolling?
The Abrams and Leopard I have hydraulically rotated turret, which the hydraulic surge tank is modeled.
The Leopard II is electrically driven.
which are control panel, fuse box and amplifier, which arent modelled in tanks. Lol :/
Yup. Idk why this other fella doesn’t see the hypocrisy of having them added to NATO tanks (because both Britain and Japan are getting the turret basket nerf with this next update) but Russia not getting the same damage model fidelity. Then again, outside of him running the M1A1 Clickbait to grind through the US tree, his top played 58 tanks are Russian
…im not sure they are added to nato tanks. Only light tanks have so many modules modelled if i remember correctly, and them USSR light tanks have them too.
The Abrams, 120S, Leopard I/II (both of Germany and export versions), PT-16/T14, all Merkava models and the Sabra have the hydraulic/electronic system for the turret control. Supposedly, the French (I said Brits earlier, that’s my bad. I remembered them because the Challengers AREN’T getting it yet) and Japanese are going to be getting it next update.
So…? USSR also have modelled electric/hydraulic engines and mechanisms that do the job. I dont see where you try to lead.
nvm i see what`s the problem here. USSR only has the engine themselves, lacks the additional modules like this
Yup, that’s the kind of system I’m talking about. Ironically, the BMPT-72 has the electronics modeled (to the left of the driver) but the MBTs themselves don’t have it. Technically, the gunner sight should also be part of it as it is what has the gyro in it but Gaijin is hit and miss on the FCS damage module addition.
To be fair they have different turrets tho. Their internals are very different with standart MBT.
And based on the picture the man showed earlier, i dont see any additional modules that can be modelled that M1 has (in terms of turret rotation). They need to model FCS in T series tho.
True, but the electronics are the same for powering it. There’s a battery pack with a control panel (which is what is shown in the BMPT) that’s there for the T-series tanks from the videos I’ve seen (ranging from the current conflict in Ukraine of captured vehicle tours to the ones they have in museums). During the start-up process, the driver has to set up the electronic power after getting the engine going (I’m sure actual combat operations have it where they can power strictly the turret off of the battery before getting the engine up to conserve fuel). Realistically, if that gets hit, it would knock out the power chain to the turret unless there’s an emergency bypass mode selected (unsure on that part as I don’t speak Russian/Ukrainian). In regards to how Gaijin does damage models, it should be treated the same as the hydraulic tank/motor the Abrams/Leopards/Merkavas have
What a surprise will be if devs add everything they ask for MBTs and turret basket turns from inconvenience to real problem.
You mean like the one the Russian MBTs are lacking to the same degree as there has to be a contact point for electrical power transfer via a slipring? And if you want to argue about that, the only thing that should be part of the hit model of the turret basket for turret rotation/elevation control on the Abrams is the literal small control panel on the front support bar of the basket with the hoses and the center piece in the hull
Yeah definitely just a small box and nothing else keep thinking that
What about them hydraulic motors?
