What do you think of the Namer in the way it is represented in the game currently?
You might not notice but there’s a second Namer with more exposed armor in the back and I think that this is what the armor should be looking like…
The IDF stated that it is more armored than the Merkava Mk4 since the turret was removed and knowing that they both have almost the same weight makes sense for it to be more armored… What do you think about it? Share your opinions.
4 Likes
Already exists a thread for this and they aren’t happy with it either
[image]
[image]
[image]
[image]
[image]
How can the vehicle possibly weigh 61 tons with no armor at all?
The side armor can’t even stop an RPG-7 with this CE thickness, let alone the Kornet, which we know it can stop.
You can also see there’s an entire part of this vehicle that’s hollow between the crew and side armor.
Why is there just a huge 400mm~ pocket of air armor where composite should be? That’s wrong.
[image]
Here’s the armor block that should be there.
Also, how is this pl…
As already mentioned, please use existing threads about the Namer’s armour.
