UD is a 11.0 tank at 10.3.
the only reason it isnt 11.0 is bc it has no Therms.
It has good armour a great round and good reload it deserves the nerf.
- 1 step closer to destroying the broken Russian 10.3 lineup.
UD is a 11.0 tank at 10.3.
the only reason it isnt 11.0 is bc it has no Therms.
It has good armour a great round and good reload it deserves the nerf.
Booooo
Booooooo!

UD is fine at 10.7 as a 80B sidegrade.
Win rate has noting to do with how good a tank is to an extent. The German 7.7 Patton was at 7.0 for the longest time (0.3 lower then the US variant) just because the German players were worse at the game
2S25M/T-80B both have thermals if you are in a map that’s better for sniping, the UD shouldn’t be coddled because wallet warriors bought their way to high tier
This OBT, must to be at the same BR as t-90, but because no Thermal is on 10.7 perfet balanced!
Its a compression problem, after the reload change it had no right to stay 10.3 so cry about the devs not decompressing your brainless prem lineup.
Its the same reason why the Bishma and T90 are both 10.7 also
You mean 80B upgrade presumably because thermals and a slight reverse gear upgrade do not make up for the t80ud having k5
No, 80B is significantly more mobile.
That’s just wrong. 279 is fine in uptiers and doesn’t play like a heavy. It doesn’t rely on not being penned to begin with. This topic is dumb, but don’t throw 279 under the bus like that.
would you be content with a leopard 2A5NL at 11.0? no cause its dumb. Its the same thing with the UD, its a T-80U at 10.3. Only with negligibly less horsepower, no thermal, and a worse dart that’s still very good for its BR. I really don’t understand this sentiment that the T-80UD is somehow bad when its extremely competitive.
279 still isn’t as good as other 9.0 tanks: it’s sluggish at that br (16.6 hp/t and 55km/h top speed), armour is mid at best vs darts, only has armour in a downtier, doesn’t have a good reload (8.6 sec with ace crew). The only thing it really gets over everything else is big apcbc with he filler which one shots virtually everything, though it’s still regular ap, meaning you need to aim it to pen (against an M60 for example). It’s definitely trolly since it’s a rare tank at 9.0, meaning people will get confused and not know how to kill it. It still doesn’t have something that’s inherently really good about it, you’d be better off playing the t62m-1 since it’s the same br with the same reload and arguably comparable armour and gets a ton of bonuses like lrf, apfsds, etc.
9.3 bros… we are so back…
each USSR MBT from T-72B to T-90M is bad. With the exception of BVM which is still bad but UUUUGH OKAY. It mustnt be new to you.
ehm…

im pretty sure DM63 easilly oneshots this stupidity of a machine. If i manage with type 93 than Olifant shouldnt have an issue. If anything, the T-72A deals more to ruin a 8.3 player`s day than UD does to 9.3
moves like 72B = negligibly.
The fact the USSR is NEVER first on caps is speaking for itself. Wow :/
with also less aim speed and with no reverse. Its as bad as 72B.
But… it has bad reverse! It’s what I kept being told.
“DM63”. Not even in the game. And the Stingray and co all use DM33. Hell even the Leo2A4 uses only DM23.
“If you use a round with way more pen than what you’re given by GJN, that would have close to or better pen than the round the T80UD is given you could pen the T80UD easily!”