which is already not that high
Glad you admit no one said what you claimed.
@MoZi3
Except for the fact MTI is still chaffable outside notch angles, just harder to chaff than standard.
@BlueRooster57
One trades flare resistance for being flared in the head-on.
R-60Ms are best used as R-60s with better initial lock characteristics.
No way out, the PDV HDN mode will performance worse because the problem of radar blind speed range, the TRK MTI is almost best when encountering that situation except the TRK PD
I quite literally quoted exactly what you said.
Again, refer to:
The entire point of HPRF over MPRF is the velocity gate reduction. Its only justification for use is it being better at retaining locks than MPRF.
Yes, you quoted a statement that is different from what you claimed was said.
The MiG-23ML can use it’s R-24Rs pretty low to the deck compared to a lot of other missiles found at it’s BR, with the help of MTI mode, of course.
Additionally the R-24Ts are silent killers too, being very long ranged without any warning. These weapons do not belong below 11.3
You claimed PD is as effective as PD HDN at holding a lock.
That is quite literally 1:1 of saying that MPRF is as effective as HPRF.
That is blatantly wrong.
I made the statement that in holding a lock, head-on only radars are currently about as effective whether they’re PDV or normal PD.
I also stated it probably shouldn’t be the case.
They belong at 11.3?
I do enjoy my loyal fanbase that fervently watches my posts noting what happens in them.
He is not being serious. He is probably salty because people didnt agree with some other post where he wanted the mig-23ml, or some other premium jet he is struggling against, and he is doing the classic childish response of going to the extreme opposite argument.
The other option is that he was killed by a mig23ml and made yet another salt thread. This is probably the more likely option.
I’ve made another post discussing the MIG-23ML? Where?
I said it was a possibility. Could have been part of another thread. I did also state the other option was more likely.
YES.
R-24R/Ts are excellent weapons. What makes you think they should be at 11.0??
bruh this plane is already spitting on planes higher than it, it absolutely dominates entire game when downtiered to 10.3 and you want to lower its br? XDDD
1 Like
If they were at 11.0 they’d be even stronger than they are now.
That’s my point, it’s already so strong, if the BR is lowered it would encourage even more sales.
and encourage everyone not to play that BR bracket, ruining the balance and a big outrage in the community.
lets move it to 9.7 why not? there is a 9.7 mig23
1 Like
People are encouraged to play anything but top tier?
That sounds more like an excuse for power creep than it is improving sales of the Mig-23ML. Why exactly should gaijin lower the Mig 23ML in br when it certainly has been purchased quite a lot already and its popularity is still very strong? You are going under your own assumption that lowering it’s br would improve sales of an existing vehicle which is probably in terms of sales doing just fine, doing that would just be milking as much money out of it as possible which might not be much seeing as even if it stays 11.3 it will still very much sell and it wouldn’t change much as you have plenty of players who already own it so it would mean that you might have to rely on more newer players to buy it, and if anything it would actually be worse since making it a better vehicle means they might not have to rely on premium time and GE as much so overall gaijin might not actually profit more by lowering it’s br. By comparison they could make more money by adding a completely new premium vehicle that the existing player base can buy along with the newer players and might not undermine any reliance on premium time and GE.
Simply put if a premium pack vehicle is selling badly and gaijin want to make a profit they don’t make it more powerful, they just remove it from sale and replace it with something newer and repeat the process. The benefits may not outweigh the consequences.