I am stealing that :D
Nooo neverrrr
Yeah… That tends to happen, especially when using it as a CAS platform.
Yet in the same frame you can literally see it’s amassing a 2.9KD with the thing. That’s literally on average ejecting an entire players spawn points with a single spawn in GSB.
Yeah, people that don’t know how a plane performs without the game doing it for them don’t matter to me, cheers though o7
CAP
I didn’t necro anything, the post before me was made May 26th.
It’s faster than even the monster Yak-3U from 4000ft and every altitude above that where it just extends its lead further… it’s faster than the TA-152 at almost every altitude and faster than the K-4 depending on the altitude whilst the Sea Fury has much better energy retention.
It’s faster than the D-30 above 3000m.
You sir are lying or doing something massively wrong, the Sea Fury climbs faster at every altitude and is literally over a minute faster to 20,000ft. As mentioned if you check the official data sheets the Sea Fury pretty much matches the Ki-84, it utterly destroys the P-51D-30… which funnily enough IS actually slower to 20,000ft.
Still more than what 109’s have and they do fine. Plus you have four cannons compared to one.
Why are you flying it below 500IAS and getting yourself into trouble with things you can’t out turn? If you want to see where its energy retention shines go into a dive and then level out, watch how well it can cling onto speed. Better yet dive from 10,000ft and then go into a vertical zoom, watch how high it goes.
Already completely debunked the D-30 quote above… you aren’t even close to reality.
The D-9 is so far the only aircraft that can potentially give the Sea Fury problems and even then as you’ve stated the Sea Fury is still superior in areas. Surely at this point you need to stop saying the Sea Fury needs a BR decrease and instead that the D-9 needs a BR increase.
As I’ve already said the Ki-84 is a superb aircraft and yet the Sea Fury climbs neck and neck with it, out runs it, holds retains energy better, is more mobile at high speed and I’d bet it’d be better in a zoom as well.
my guy, it gets outperformed by 4.7 planes. The funniest thing is that none of you who try to refute my argument about the sea fury’s underwhelming nature lie about your stats or straight up do not play the sea fury in none of the existing game modes.
try playing the sea fury in air RB where everyone can see where you are. Of course, in sim mode anyone is a menace to anyone, boom and zoom is the meta of sim because you’re above and mostly on the six of the enemy so you’re forcing it to look behind while flying forward.
233/99 < 282/86 and with an instructor limit.
The sea fury in sim mode is a whole different animal. Still it does not dump on ki84s or 190s. These two out perform it in every single metric including and especially energy retention and climb rate.
It’s faster than even the monster Yak-3U from 4000ft and every altitude above that where it just extends its lead
And yet it takes thrice the amount of time to reach said speeds. The BI is a very slow jet that even compresses really badly past 700 IAS ( which are the minimum speeds everyone is flying at it’s br) and yet the fact it can reach critical speeds quicker than other jets makes it dangerous.
You sir are lying or doing something massively wrong, the Sea Fury climbs faster at every altitude and is literally over a minute faster to 20,000ft. As mentioned if you check the official data sheets the Sea Fury pretty much matches the Ki-84, it utterly destroys the P-51D-30… which funnily enough IS actually slower to 20,000ft.
Are you aware that the p51d30 is a sub 4km alt fighter and that rarely air rb matches develop above 5km of altitude? Are you aware that the p51d30 is literally faster than the 109 k4 below 2km of altitude even though both are low altitude tuned aircraft? how do you have the sheer AUDACITY that the sea fury matches the ki84, a highly agile prop that has a 32m/s climb rate on min fuel and 15 degrees with the sea fury that barely has 23m/s?
Official data sheets shall NOT be trusted, this is the main proof that you are a shill. Official data sheets say that the swift f7 only has a 30m/sec climb rate on spade performance (20m/s less than the mig17) and yet it out climbs the cl13b mk6 and the mig17f of the chinese premium pack (also named Shenyang F-5).
Still more than what 109’s have and they do fine. Plus you have four cannons compared to one.
So for you the j7w1 which can break mach 0.85 above 3km of altitude without compressing and has four 30mm cannons is the best aircraft in game, huh?
Why are you flying it below 500IAS and getting yourself into trouble with things you can’t out turn? If you want to see where its energy retention shines go into a dive and then level out, watch how well it can cling onto speed. Better yet dive from 10,000ft and then go into a vertical zoom, watch how high it goes.
I don’t fly it below 500 ias, it just reaches that speed the moment I make the slightest movement. As I said, the sea fury does not possess good energy retention. It’s engine power is limited, and it has shorter, smaller area wings compared to the tempest mk2, which turns so much worse and yet is such a fantastic aircraft because it has the speed, engine power, MER and climb rate a 5.7 deserves.
My theory about war thunder players going crazy and overrating a plane for having above average climb rate even if it’s utter dog food is true. Such is the case with the mig19 when i had the quarrels about it back in the day, or the i225, or the ki83, planes i never ever had a single problem against even if the enemies were grandmasters that do TIMES THREE our stats. These planes I cry about are highly situational and the sea fury is the best for jumping on people that don’t know about your presence and running away at 800kmh, just like the j5n1 or the ta152C3. And in sim mode, ganking on unsuspecting people is how most frags are taken.