it’s a strong plane but still a skill check. If 9.3s like mig19s, Lightnings and f104s are dying to it it’s just a skill issue.
F3H is a better air RB plane and in an isolated scenario it can be a diabolically good aircraft for vertical looping and slats-out energy trapping. The “bad energy retention” thing is not an excuse if you have an engine that can put your plane from 500 ias to 1000 ias quicker than the f-5a which is a 10.7 plane.
CA27 while strong it is still going to be a sabre without slats and suffer the same things sabres without slats suffer from. Poor high speed thrust, poor low speed thrust, poor flaps, iffy rate consistency and extremely fragile airframe.
I’m not going to keep repeating myself. You seem to have a problem with not wanting to be disrespected and wanting to be taken seriously. You constantly accusing me of “lying” is going to make me simply treat you like Rico instead of how you want. Quit doing this childish crap and just discuss the topic. Nobody is “lying” to you. “Lying” is intentful deceitfulness. Not being “”““wrong””" about something.
Last time I’m going to explain that very elementary thing to you. Figure it out bud.
You really think that wanting to be respected is an issue? You have been a complete burden to my topics by responding with “no, lmao, skill issue” and just simply throw strawmen without any basis whenever you’re forced to elaborate. You have alwas treated me like Rico, so once more, you are lying about something. You call me childish, yet you are the one using reddit comebacks like “ur mom” type comments.
“Lying” is intentful deceitfulness
Yet another lie. You can lie without knowing by stating something wrong while not knowing about it or after being told the opposite by someone who has more knowledge than you. Like how you say that MTI radars can be notched and chaffed and sticking to it after explaining you very briefly how MTI radars work. You have been proven wrong about F3H being a bad dogfighter by pointing out that it excels at super slow speed and vertical scissors like delta wings because not everything is a ratefight, which is something it can totally disengage from if it’s from a non afterburning jet. And so much more. Corsair, you’re lying and acting in bad faith and being a nuisance strawman spamming nonstop and lying nonstop as well just accusing me of your own caveats.
I have seen you low-key agreeing with me in the least seen posts in this forum just to contrary me whenever you respond to my comments. You’re a hypocrite.
No, you can’t. And with this drivel of a comment you have sealed your fate as far as I’m concerned, could have had normal discussions but u gotta rico everything up. Reminds me when you said the MiG-19 needed R-60s or to be 8.7
Lmao test this for yourself anytime. MTI in game is just as notchable and chaffable as PD.
I have literally, never, not once, ever said the F3H was a bad dogfighter.
I also didn’t say anything about ratefighting being the most important aspect of air RB. In fact I routinely say the opposite. You just don’t know what context nor nuance mean, like, at all.
How can I have normal discussions with someone who answered “lmao skill issue” (while being worse) and “lol” and “no” and “rico schizo” since the very beginning? this is the very first time you have written something elaborate, offered yourself to test stuff out and still fell off of it to drop back to strawmans. According to you, demonstrating that you’re wrong and a bad player with much less skill in the planes I complain about is “ricoing my way out”; no scimitar, you’re simply not accustomed to have someone who speaks out loud not be your average flat earther mindset guy but someone who actually knows what he’s talking about. This enrages you and that’s why you then call me egotistical.
I have literally, never, not once, ever said the F3H was a bad dogfighter.
I also didn’t say anything about ratefighting being the most important aspect of air RB. In fact I routinely say the opposite. You just don’t know what context nor nuance mean, like, at all.
You did. Another blatant lie. You were the one who kept hammering on the fact that f-5 outrates most things at it’s br, I WAS the one saying it doesnt matter when everyone can run away from you and kill you in the distance while you’re busy with those who don’t run away from you.
Lmao test this for yourself anytime. MTI in game is just as notchable and chaffable as PD.
Tested it enough as receiving end and giving end. Not notchable. Not chaffable. You can pre-chaff it, but you can’t post chaff it.
Statistics say otherwise, so do anybody who watches what you post here.
Because this is how you act. I don’t respect you. At all. You could have changed that by simply knocking it off with the annoyances but you doubled down when I asked you to but you didn’t, so here we are.
You do not know what the word strawman means. You also were the first to start up with this nonsense again arguing in bad faith.
Find a single soul in this universe who thinks you’re better than me, please, lmao. You’re the guy that thinks MTI can’t be notched or chaffed.
Haha 97 percentile
No it’s more of stuff like this seen below
Quote it. One opportunity.
Not how the convo went exactly. Again, nuance and context are foreign concepts.
Hey Rico, anytime you like, join a custom and fly any MTI jet and watch me notch and chaff your MTI radar first try every time
it certainly seemed strong in pre-september statshark runnings yea but i dont think it was quite enough to be an issue worth sabre rattling about when the game has major issues with the ariete still being 9.3
Everyone and their mums is packing a F-3H now as the improvements to sparrows ware rather significant.
it could probably have gone to 9.3 before, now i think its a safe 9.7
