You do realize that the SEPV1 is weaker than the M1A1 at a higher BR right?
Nah i hate the feeling of getting cripled by literally anything.
You do realize that the SEPV1 is weaker than the M1A1 at a higher BR right?
Nah i hate the feeling of getting cripled by literally anything.
Sure, I still did pretty well in it whenever I took it out.
It’s widely known that M1A1 is borderline overpowered at 11.3, especially pre nerf. So no shot a lot of people did/do well in it.
Whenever I shoot an Abrams it either dies in 1 shot or gets crippled, whenever I shoot a BVM it dies in 1 shot or gets crippled.
For me there really just isn’t much of a difference when facing them. And when playing them I prefer the active advantages of the Abrams over the Passive advantages of the BVM.
Well its still your opinion, but i prefer having a tank with no bugs and armored so even i play like shit there’s my armor to protect me, reload wont save you nor mobility if you get disabled instantly by any little threat possible.
I never really seen hordes of light vehicles at those ranks. No wonder to be honest, as those are pretty inferior to MBTs in most situations.
You are right that it is just an opinion. I play around not getting hit, so the Abrams strengths suit my playstyle much better than the BVM strengths.
I think this video sums up top tier tanks very well, however I think he’s a bit too biased in favor of the BVM.
How so? It’s one of the most well rounded tanks you can get at top-tier. Hell, I somehow went 12-0 when I was stock.
NATO tanks are well rounded, having good gun depression, reloads, and reverse speeds. The BVM can’t really hull-down, which is why I don’t consider it to well rounded and would 100% take a Leo/Abrams.
Before the air superiority update I would have absolutely put the BVM in S tier. However now I think it’s solid A tier.
Yeah same here.