This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Mmh 🤔
The T-64s has great turret protection in its respective br, it’s almost as good as Chieftain Mk10’s and trading fire in a hull down position seemingly not very risky. Only thing that could reliably pen you through the turret is Sabra.
1 Like
if the american mains could read they’d be really upset with you rn
8 Likes
No turret ring is invincible, but buffing it to 200mm of protection would help alot against light vehicles, that’s why they’ve been saying but we can’t forget about no hull improvements whatsoever from the base M1 to the SEPV2.
4 Likes
If only autocannon vehicles at top tier weren’t a dying breed. Buffing the armor there won’t really help you much in most engagements. I’d say that changing the placement of the hydraulic pump would be a much better buff, but I rarely even see that being talked about.
Nah
And the T-series aren’t? I have surely 1-2 shot killed a lot of them today.
2A7s and Strv 122s make up the top 5 MBTs by a longshot. 6-9 is the Type 10, TKX, SEPv1 and BVM in any order really.
With how many 2S38s/BMP-2Ms you see running around? it would be a massive help for all Abrams especially during sales.
Although yeah the M1/IPM1/M1A1 would benefit most from it.
2 Likes
So you saying that you’d take a SEPV1 which is exactly like the SEPV2 but without the add-on side armor over a BVM?
Pre turret basket/vertical drive nerf? Yes, every time any day of the week.
Post turret basket/vertical drive nerf? Still yes, but not as massively yes as before.
Imo the reduced mobility from the 4t of mostly useless side ERA just ruins the SEPv2 for me.
1 Like
You do realize that the SEPV1 is weaker than the M1A1 at a higher BR right?
Nah i hate the feeling of getting cripled by literally anything.
Sure, I still did pretty well in it whenever I took it out.
It’s widely known that M1A1 is borderline overpowered at 11.3, especially pre nerf. So no shot a lot of people did/do well in it.
Whenever I shoot an Abrams it either dies in 1 shot or gets crippled, whenever I shoot a BVM it dies in 1 shot or gets crippled.
For me there really just isn’t much of a difference when facing them. And when playing them I prefer the active advantages of the Abrams over the Passive advantages of the BVM.
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
I never really seen hordes of light vehicles at those ranks. No wonder to be honest, as those are pretty inferior to MBTs in most situations.
3 Likes
You are right that it is just an opinion. I play around not getting hit, so the Abrams strengths suit my playstyle much better than the BVM strengths.
1 Like
I think this video sums up top tier tanks very well, however I think he’s a bit too biased in favor of the BVM.
3 Likes
How so? It’s one of the most well rounded tanks you can get at top-tier. Hell, I somehow went 12-0 when I was stock.
1 Like
NATO tanks are well rounded, having good gun depression, reloads, and reverse speeds. The BVM can’t really hull-down, which is why I don’t consider it to well rounded and would 100% take a Leo/Abrams.
3 Likes
Before the air superiority update I would have absolutely put the BVM in S tier. However now I think it’s solid A tier.
3 Likes
Yeah same here.
1 Like
It this the guy that put the T-90M below the Abrams, Challenger 3 TD, Challenger 2E and Leclerc in terms of “defense” and below the Abrams, Leclerc, Challenger 3 TD, Challenger 2E, Merkava 4M, ZTZ99A, WZ101(E) LCT, and Ariete AMV PT1 in terms of “attack,” lol?