Regarding the drop speed limit on gbu53 we will have to see. You should be able to drop over Mach 1 since Gbu53 is just a SDB1 with seeker on it and different warhead. The pylon used for GBU 53 is designed for supersonic drops with SBDs which is reflected in game.
2 Likes
ww2 vehicles dont even get to have their own brs without post war vehicles being sprinkled in between them. You are kidding yourself
1 Like
Oh I agree that they should, but I have a feeling thst they might use it as a “balancing” tool.
WW2 vehicles being mixed with post war ones is a BR compression issue, not a lack of WW2 content. Adding more WW2 tanks won’t fix matchmaking, it just adds more filler. The game already has most meaningful WW2 vehicles, what it needs is decompression, not another slightly different Sherman.
An update focused around more top BR MBT stuff? Nah. I’ll pass on that.
An update focused around french produced middle-high BR light armor? Now that’s a good idea.
1 Like
Oh no, more new MBTs for the Reds? No thanks.
I don’t see SEPV4 and Abrams X.
I’m not sure the M44 and M55 being at 4.0 or whatever is a compression issue.
Beforehand most of the post war tanks at low BR’s were just Sweden’s TT and the M41, now we just have post-war copy paste SPG slop in like 5 trees.
A couple of these would be cool.
T-72B3M Obr.2025
ZTZ-99A w/ GL-6
Leopard 2A7NOR
Leopard 2A6HEL
Spoiler
Leopard 2A7A1
leopard 2 “Technologieträger”
Spoiler
2 Likes
And then britain gets Challenger 2E, 3TD, 3 Prototype…
And USSR gets another shithole T-90
Dont see how that is focused on making already strong lineup too strong again?
We already have sweden that is too strong with uparmored leopards, ut they at least dont wield long cannons and most modern munitions…
Those who win with such additions are either Germany or those who get german 2a8-ish machines like italy. So its again horde of 2a8s added to break balance.
People will continue to misuse the word slop to sound smarter/more professional than they truely are lol, thanks for being another example of this.
1 Like
I mean as long as there’s some low and mid tier stuff for all branches as well I wouldn’t mind a modern mbt focused update.
4 Likes
I want more ground focused updates in general
4 Likes
Ofc! They can always mix :)
3 Likes
