More modern MBT’s! :)

I’d really love to see some new MBTs in the next update. We’ve been stuck with the same top-tier tanks for quite a while now, so I wanted to hear what you guys think.

Please share your opinion, whether you agree or disagree, and if you disagree, let me know why! :)
And if there’s a specific tank you want to see, drop a picture of it!

Would you like to have a MBT focused update?
  • Yes
  • No
  • Maybe?
0 voters
Spoiler





IMG_0058

2 Likes

+1
would be awesome to see leopard 2A8 it’s so pretty 😻

image

USA
M1a2 Sep V4


i don’t know whats different from other m1a2 sep

3 Likes

We know what’s missing:
KNDS-E-MBT_01-768x512
The good old Leo-Clerc

2 Likes

Before leopard 2A8, I would still like to see leopard varients like Leo 2A7A1 and leo 2A6A3

That’s basically the same…

No, IIRC Leo 2A7A1 uses 2A6 hull while Leo 2A8 does not

Yes, please…

The uncontested focus on jets these past 2 years, with over 70 jets added, a new Rank and gamemode being worked on, is tiring for a ground player who has been waiting for… something ever since December 2023; back when Rank VIII Ground was introduced.

It still feels like we’ve gone nowhere in these two years despite that rank having been marketed like a big thing. Yet top tier ground still feels the exact same since 2018.

3 Likes

This is a good list, could also add the Challanger 3 130mm eventually

1 Like

Thanks! Yeah, I had that one in my previous version of the list, hahah.

I did not include it on this one as to avoid prototypes as much as possible; but it would definitely be an interesting addition.

1 Like

For USSR

Object 219m

T-80BVM with Burlak turret.

Object 640

3 Likes

It kinda looks like something AI would make don’t know if im the only one, still very cool!! :)

+1 black eagle is very cool!

We dont need more MBTs in the game. Stop adding them and focus on the important stuff

Mind i ask you why u think so? :)

I mean we haven’t received a new top tier tank in a long while. we’ve been stuck with the same old tanks for 1-2 years (The m1a2t does not count, copy paste)

1 Like

Dude. MBTs haven’t had the spotlight in 2+ years. It’s all been jets, jets, jets, jets.

And the only relevant ground additions have been… SAMs to counter that jet spam on the first place.

What do you mean “stop adding them”? We’ve received like 3 since December 2023’s update, compared to 70+ jets in the same timeframe.

What’s the “important stuff” anyway? 3,000 more jets?

1 Like

The New Leclerc XLR

image

3 Likes

MBTs are at a point where the game isnt really working for them. You cant tell me that you really enjoy playing Sweden in your M1A2 Sep V2, when Russia gets the T-90M and T-80BVM. Its always so one sided map wise be it biased towards NATO or Warsaw pact tanks. Fix the game BEFORE you stuff it up more. Adding more and more MBTs does not fix the fundamental issues with the game such as overpowered SPAA, asymmetrical standards in terms of damage models, maps being too small, along with being biased towards one side (tbf it is difficult to fully balance a map), helicopters being simultaneously useless, overpowered, and pointless, volumetric still has so many issues, overpressure needs reworking and perhaps a relook at hull break, maybe a combination of the two, HESH/APHE/APCR/APDS/CHEATFS all needing a rework. Currently the only usable shells are APHE and APFSDS/Solid AP, with APHE being too overpowered. Revert the change to stop aircraft capping zones. I could continue. We do not need MBTs at the moment we need to prioritise the games issues. The only additions that could work in the current game state is realistically pre-Korean war ones due to the almost balanced nature of their BRs (SPAA and APHE are still way too OP though)

Which we didn’t need

I posted my response in my previous message. Didnt see your messages so didnt quote you in it sorry.

No we do NOT need more jets either.

1 Like

I would not only like to see more top tier MBTs added but some low and mid tier ground vehicle as well. It has been way too long since there’s been a good ground oriented update.

1 Like

I agree with what all you said except for this. Why didn’t we need it though?