More modern MBT’s! :)

Im afraid to tell you that i actually like the Sweden map alot, so yeah i actually enjoy playing sweden.
T90m and t80bvm are not hard targets to kill, everything can kill everything in top tier.

So you’re telling me we should not get any vehicles in the next update?

True

We literally do.

IMG_6854

Did we not?

I didn’t want to have this argument lol, i just wanted to create this thread so i could see what people wanted. But i guess it was kinda my fault as i brought it self upon me :)

Yes i agree! Aslong as we don’t get useless vehicles like boxers. It seems gaijin likes them alot, in my opinion it’s a lazy excuse to fill in gaps in the tech tree.

1 Like

What - Sun Tzu

No they’re not but you have to admit that they favour some maps. Just like how the Abrams favours others.

Add the vehicles we can add without breaking the game, like the Schofield, Matilda 1, Matilda 2, other stuff that wont cause worse compression and can be easier to model due to more information

Not over fixing the game

I’m not trying to argue with you mate, I’m just providing my opinions. I dont personally thing we needed the newer SPAAs. They’re kinda OP like all SPAAs are. Thats kinda the issue though isnt it? The game is like a loop, CAS is OP against tanks, SPAA is OP against aircraft, tanks are generally well off against SPAA, but only in a 1 on 1 situation. War thunder is a very asymmetric game which makes balancing hard

1 Like

But what do you mean by “fixing the game” that it would be strictly mutually exclusive to new content that has been in drought for years?

You realize that Gaijin is a multimillion company with hundreds of employees and most of the job regarding new additions is outsourced anyway?

You speak like it’s “either” new content or “fixing the game”. So let me ask; after these 2+ years of ground drought… where are those fixes?

? You said i could not like playing Sweden in my sep v2, i naturally think u mean the map? Did u not?

Ok? That has nothing to do with gaijins modeling of maps, i agree some maps are absolute trash, but the problem of maps favoring different tanks has more to do with different tank philosophy’s , go complain to the engineers or sum idk.

New top tier tanks wouldn’t break the game;)

That’s a separate problem.

IMG_6354
Especially with free anti air, if you’re teammates die from cas (especially a large amount of them) most of the time 70% of them tend to jump into anti air immediately, making them free targets and useless teammates.

Yes I did, but thats the first time I’ve ever seen anyone like Sweden lmao

I mean they kinda will to an extent. It wont break anything in terms of Russia Vs USA, but take Britain for example, the Black Knight one of their best tanks, is 12.7, all it really has going for it is mediocre APS. If gaijin adds new tanks they wont add it at 14.0 so it cant face that will they? No it’ll go to 13.0, where naturally say it was an M1A2 Sep V3, it would get M829A4 or similar, which is significantly more powerful than L27A1. There’s not really any upgrade for Britain over that until we get another Challenger 3 with L/55 and DM63 which wont be for a long time.

Not to mention they tend to just go AFK as soon as they do that. They dont even bother.

Again this is all my opinions, and I dont play top tier all that much. I much prefer lower BRs but I’ve played enough of top tier to know that its a bit of a mess and personally I would rather see improvements in the gamemode and balance over new vehicles for it. If the game became more balanced at that tier then I would maybe play it. Currently my favourite top tier tank is the Challenger 2 OES (yes I know its not 12.7 but whatever, fights against them every match), and I like it mostly because she’s gorgeous, and while she’s very usable and not completely useless, she’s obviously at a disadvantage. At just 12.0 you get the M1A1HC and AGS. BOTH of which are 10x as effective as a Challenger. Maybe I dont play top tier enough

12321232
Yes
We did
The Kh-38 was a demented addition

1 Like

Which should never have been added but doesnt justify adding other stuff

1 Like

how about we get some good maps for once

or new modes

or decompression

or something other than mbts that are not even that interesting
woooo another 2a7 for 400k rp? damn sell me a hundred

1 Like

Different department

They stated they didn’t do it not from a lack of time or resources but as an active choice and decision- since they are now catering air with a new mode, hopefully ground will be next

Again, not a matter of lack of time or resources but active choice, to “make matches more varied”… it’s BS, but not an issue brought by the addition of vehicles

Like what? The SAMs and Light Vehicles we’ve been getting? We’ve barely got any MBTs at all since December 2023.

Wooo another F-16/18/SU-30/EF? Etc. of course it may be another 2A7- there’s only a few modern families with lots of variants.

At least in ground there are lineups and new additions would serve as backups and lineup enhancers

they outsource modelling anyway, they barely even make models themselves

those are not interesting

yeah everybody loves an another 30mm trashmaster wheeled ifv

no add something that is NOT top br
also

i would surely love the inevitable 2a7 vs. 2a7 TDM

Precisely, which is why therefore the addition of new vehicles isn’t mutually exclusive to any other field of work.

The new SAMs are literally the only thing making ground top tier minimally playable. Before them, C*S simply stomped with no opposition at all.

Exactly.

Again; we’ve had like 3 top BR MBTs added in over 2 years. Some of you keep acting like we got plenity of them when it’s the field that has suffered the biggest drought over these years…

notice how you didn’t say they were interesting in any way

we didn’t need new spaa like we didn’t need kh38/lmurs/spikes/whatever other cancer cas there is

said nobody never actually, nobody actually likes those

for a good reason
how would you even bugreport a leclerc xlr? object 195? armata? 2a8? we literally barely know anything about them
not to mention most nations dont have an equivalently strong mbt at all

i can guarantee you 100% people would appreciate an abrams turret ribg over 10 another 2a7 variants

I think we need to fill already existing gaps across TT instead of adding more modern tanks.

1 Like